From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F50A6B0071 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:19:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:16:51 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter Message-ID: <20100211151651.GA8753@localhost> References: <201002091659.27037.knikanth@suse.de> <201002111546.35036.knikanth@suse.de> <201002111715.04411.knikanth@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002111715.04411.knikanth@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nikanth Karthikesan Cc: Ankit Jain , Andrew Morton , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Jens Axboe , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Christian Ehrhardt List-ID: Nikanth, > From: Nikanth Karthikesan > > Add new kernel parameter "readahead", which would be used instead of the > value of VM_MAX_READAHEAD. If the parameter is not specified, the default > of 128kb would be used. The patch looks good to me, though it conflicts with my patches. Do you mind me including a modified version in my readahead patchset? Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org