From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] Export unusable free space index via /proc/pagetypeinfo
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:36:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216083612.GA26086@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100216152106.72FA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:03:29PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Unusuable free space index is a measure of external fragmentation that
> > takes the allocation size into account. For the most part, the huge page
> > size will be the size of interest but not necessarily so it is exported
> > on a per-order and per-zone basis via /proc/pagetypeinfo.
>
> Hmmm..
> /proc/pagetype have a machine unfriendly format. perhaps, some user have own ugly
> /proc/pagetype parser. It have a little risk to break userland ABI.
>
It's very low risk. I doubt there are machine parsers of
/proc/pagetypeinfo because there are very few machine-orientated actions
that can be taken based on the information. It's more informational for
a user if they were investigating fragmentation problems.
> I have dumb question. Why can't we use another file?
>
I could. What do you suggest?
>
> > The index is normally calculated as a value between 0 and 1 which is
> > obviously unsuitable within the kernel. Instead, the first three decimal
> > places are used as a value between 0 and 1000 for an integer approximation.
>
> I think we can treat separately internal representaion and /proc displaing
> style. example, load-average have fixed point internal representaion. but
> /proc/loadavg hide it.
>
> So, I personally like to keep this internal representation and change external
> representaion to 0.000-1.000 or 0.0%-100.0% range.
>
I don't want to use a percentage for this value as there are two
indices, one of which can be expressed as a percentage and the other
not. I can represent it has a value between 0 and 1 if you prefer.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > ---
> > Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 10 ++++
> > mm/vmstat.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > index 1829dfb..0968a81 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > @@ -614,6 +614,10 @@ Node 0, zone DMA32, type Movable 169 152 113 91 77
> > Node 0, zone DMA32, type Reserve 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0
> > Node 0, zone DMA32, type Isolate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >
> > +Unusable free space index at order
> > +Node 0, zone DMA 0 0 0 2 6 18 34 67 99 227 485
> > +Node 0, zone DMA32 0 0 1 2 4 7 10 17 23 31 34
> > +
> > Number of blocks type Unmovable Reclaimable Movable Reserve Isolate
> > Node 0, zone DMA 2 0 5 1 0
> > Node 0, zone DMA32 41 6 967 2 0
> > @@ -629,6 +633,12 @@ then gives the same type of information as buddyinfo except broken down
> > by migrate-type and finishes with details on how many page blocks of each
> > type exist.
> >
> > +The unusable free space index measures how much of the available free
> > +memory cannot be used to satisfy an allocation of a given size and is a
> > +value between 0 and 1000. The higher the value, the more of free memory is
> > +unusable and by implication, the worse the external fragmentation is. The
> > +percentage of unusable free memory can be found by dividing this value by 10.
> > +
> > If min_free_kbytes has been tuned correctly (recommendations made by hugeadm
> > from libhugetlbfs http://sourceforge.net/projects/libhugetlbfs/), one can
> > make an estimate of the likely number of huge pages that can be allocated
> > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > index 6051fba..d05d610 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > @@ -451,6 +451,104 @@ static int frag_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +struct contig_page_info {
> > + unsigned long free_pages;
> > + unsigned long free_blocks_total;
> > + unsigned long free_blocks_suitable;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Calculate the number of free pages in a zone, how many contiguous
> > + * pages are free and how many are large enough to satisfy an allocation of
> > + * the target size. Note that this function makes to attempt to estimate
> > + * how many suitable free blocks there *might* be if MOVABLE pages were
> > + * migrated. Calculating that is possible, but expensive and can be
> > + * figured out from userspace
> > + */
> > +static void fill_contig_page_info(struct zone *zone,
> > + unsigned int suitable_order,
> > + struct contig_page_info *info)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int order;
> > +
> > + info->free_pages = 0;
> > + info->free_blocks_total = 0;
> > + info->free_blocks_suitable = 0;
> > +
> > + for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
> > + unsigned long blocks;
> > +
> > + /* Count number of free blocks */
> > + blocks = zone->free_area[order].nr_free;
> > + info->free_blocks_total += blocks;
> > +
> > + /* Count free base pages */
> > + info->free_pages += blocks << order;
> > +
> > + /* Count the suitable free blocks */
> > + if (order >= suitable_order)
> > + info->free_blocks_suitable += blocks <<
> > + (order - suitable_order);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Return an index indicating how much of the available free memory is
> > + * unusable for an allocation of the requested size.
> > + */
> > +static int unusable_free_index(struct zone *zone,
> > + unsigned int order,
> > + struct contig_page_info *info)
> > +{
> > + /* No free memory is interpreted as all free memory is unusable */
> > + if (info->free_pages == 0)
> > + return 1000;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Index should be a value between 0 and 1. Return a value to 3
> > + * decimal places.
> > + *
> > + * 0 => no fragmentation
> > + * 1 => high fragmentation
> > + */
>
> I leraned math by japanese. probably then I couldn't understand what mean
> "3 decimal places" awhile.
> Simply can't we write "Index should be a value between 0 and 1000"?
>
I can do either that or make it really display between 0 and 1. I'd
prefer displaying between 0 and 1 myself.
>
> > + return ((info->free_pages - (info->free_blocks_suitable << order)) * 1000) / info->free_pages;
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pagetypeinfo_showunusable_print(struct seq_file *m,
> > + pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int order;
> > +
> > + /* Alloc on stack as interrupts are disabled for zone walk */
> > + struct contig_page_info info;
> > +
> > + seq_printf(m, "Node %4d, zone %8s %19s",
> > + pgdat->node_id,
> > + zone->name, " ");
> > + for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; ++order) {
> > + fill_contig_page_info(zone, order, &info);
> > + seq_printf(m, "%6d ", unusable_free_index(zone, order, &info));
> > + }
> > +
> > + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Display unusable free space index
> > + * XXX: Could be a lot more efficient, but it's not a critical path
> > + */
> > +static int pagetypeinfo_showunusable(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t *)arg;
> > +
> > + seq_printf(m, "\nUnusable free space index at order\n");
> > + walk_zones_in_node(m, pgdat, pagetypeinfo_showunusable_print);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file *m,
> > pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone)
> > {
> > @@ -558,6 +656,7 @@ static int pagetypeinfo_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> > seq_printf(m, "Pages per block: %lu\n", pageblock_nr_pages);
> > seq_putc(m, '\n');
> > pagetypeinfo_showfree(m, pgdat);
> > + pagetypeinfo_showunusable(m, pgdat);
> > pagetypeinfo_showblockcount(m, pgdat);
> >
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 1.6.5
> >
>
>
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 12:00 [PATCH 0/12] Memory Compaction v2r12 Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm: Document /proc/pagetypeinfo Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 15:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-16 7:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 02/12] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 17:43 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 03/12] Export unusable free space index via /proc/pagetypeinfo Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 8:36 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-02-16 8:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 8:50 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 18:28 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 15:23 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-18 15:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] Export fragmentation " Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 7:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 8:41 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 8:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-17 1:44 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 15:37 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 05/12] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 8:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-16 14:59 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-18 19:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-18 21:35 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-19 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 13:29 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 15:45 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 16:58 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-18 17:34 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-19 1:21 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-19 14:33 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 06/12] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 18:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-02-12 18:38 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 16:30 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-19 1:56 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 07/12] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 16:30 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 08/12] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-02-18 3:57 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 09/12] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-02-18 4:09 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm: Check for an empty VMA list in rmap_walk_anon Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 18:22 ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 11/12] mm: Take the RCU read lock " Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] mm: Check the anon_vma is still valid in rmap_walk_anon() Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100216083612.GA26086@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).