From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7086B0047 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:03:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:03:27 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: please don't apply : bootmem: avoid DMA32 zone by default Message-ID: <20100307010327.GD15725@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <49b004811003041321g2567bac8yb73235be32a27e7c@mail.gmail.com> <20100305032106.GA12065@cmpxchg.org> <49b004811003042117n720f356h7e10997a1a783475@mail.gmail.com> <4B915074.4020704@kernel.org> <4B916BD6.8010701@kernel.org> <4B91EBC6.6080509@kernel.org> <20100306162234.e2cc84fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100306162234.e2cc84fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Yinghai Lu , Greg Thelen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Weiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:22:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Earlier, Johannes wrote > > : Humm, now that is a bit disappointing. Because it means we will never > : get rid of bootmem as long as it works for the other architectures. > : And your changeset just added ~900 lines of code, some of it being a > : rather ugly compatibility layer in bootmem that I hoped could go away > : again sooner than later. Whoa! Who's proposing to get rid of bootmem, and why? Paul. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org