linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:35:15 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310023515.GY8653@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100309173535.GI4883@csn.ul.ie>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:35:36PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:03:32AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > I mean the other way around. If that zone's watermarks are not met, then
> > why shouldn't it be woken up by other zones reaching their watermarks.
> > 
> 
> Doing it requires moving to a per-node structure or a global queue. I'd rather
> not add hot lines to the node structure (and the associated lookup cost in
> the free path) if I can help it. A global queue would work on smaller machines
> but I'd be worried about thundering herd problems on larger machines. I know
> congestion_wait is already a global queue but IO is a relatively slow event.
> Potentially the wakeups from this queue are a lot faster.
> 
> Should I just move to a global queue as a starting point and see what
> problems are caused later?

Yes. This should change allocation behaviours less than your patch does
now in the presence of multiple allocatees stuck in the wait with
different preferred zones.

I would worry about thundering herds as a different problem we already
have. And if wakeups are less frequent, then each one is more likely to
cause a thundering herd anyway.


> > Yep. And it doesn't really solve that race either becuase the zone
> > might subsequently go below the watermark.
> > 
> 
> True. In theory, the same sort of races currently apply with
> congestion_wait() but that's just an excuse. There is a strong
> possibility we could behave better with respect to watermarks.

We can probably avoid all races where the process sleeps too long
(ie. misses wakeups). Waking up too early and finding pages already
allocated is harder and probably can't really be solved without all
allocatees checking the waitqueue before taking pages.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 11:48 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 13:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 14:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 15:03       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:42         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 18:22           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:38             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 17:35         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:35           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-03-09 15:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:56     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:01         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:30             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  9:53   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:08     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:23       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:36         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:11           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Put kswapd to sleep on its own waitqueue, not congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:00   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:32       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 23:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  6:39   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 10:47       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 12:15         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 14:37           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 12:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:45               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 20:09               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-16 10:11                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 14:35                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 21:35                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 11:48                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:56                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 22:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24 14:50                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 12:22                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 21:44                         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20  7:20                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20 15:32                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 17:22                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21  4:23                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21 13:19                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-22  6:21                                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                         ` Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 11:59                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 12:43                                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 14:20                                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-27 14:00                                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  9:03                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21 13:20                                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                           ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24  2:38                   ` Greg KH
2010-03-24 11:49                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 13:13                   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-12  9:09   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100310023515.GY8653@laptop \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).