linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:48:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100324134816.529778bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269347146-7461-11-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:25:45 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> Ordinarily when a high-order allocation fails, direct reclaim is entered to
> free pages to satisfy the allocation.  With this patch, it is determined if
> an allocation failed due to external fragmentation instead of low memory
> and if so, the calling process will compact until a suitable page is
> freed. Compaction by moving pages in memory is considerably cheaper than
> paging out to disk and works where there are locked pages or no swap. If
> compaction fails to free a page of a suitable size, then reclaim will
> still occur.
> 
> Direct compaction returns as soon as possible. As each block is compacted,
> it is checked if a suitable page has been freed and if so, it returns.
> 
>
> ...
>
> +static inline unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone,
> +						int order, gfp_t gfp_mask)

Suggest that you re-review all the manual inlining in the patchset. 
It's rarely needed and often incorrect.

> +{
> +	struct compact_control cc = {
> +		.nr_freepages = 0,
> +		.nr_migratepages = 0,
> +		.order = order,
> +		.migratetype = allocflags_to_migratetype(gfp_mask),
> +		.zone = zone,
> +	};
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.freepages);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages);
> +
> +	return compact_zone(zone, &cc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * try_to_compact_pages - Direct compact to satisfy a high-order allocation
> + * @zonelist: The zonelist used for the current allocation
> + * @order: The order of the current allocation
> + * @gfp_mask: The GFP mask of the current allocation
> + * @nodemask: The allowed nodes to allocate from
> + *
> + * This is the main entry point for direct page compaction.
> + */
> +unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> +			int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +{
> +	enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
> +	int may_enter_fs = gfp_mask & __GFP_FS;
> +	int may_perform_io = gfp_mask & __GFP_IO;
> +	unsigned long watermark;
> +	struct zoneref *z;
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +	int rc = COMPACT_INCOMPLETE;
> +
> +	/* Check whether it is worth even starting compaction */
> +	if (order == 0 || !may_enter_fs || !may_perform_io)
> +		return rc;

hm, that was sad.  All those darn wireless drivers doing their
high-order GFP_ATOMIC allocations cannot be saved?

> +	/*
> +	 * We will not stall if the necessary conditions are not met for
> +	 * migration but direct reclaim seems to account stalls similarly
> +	 */
> +	count_vm_event(COMPACTSTALL);
> +
> +	/* Compact each zone in the list */
> +	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> +								nodemask) {

Will all of this code play nicely with memory hotplug?

> +		int fragindex;
> +		int status;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction. Note
> +		 * the 2UL. This is because during migration, copies of
> +		 * pages need to be allocated and for a short time, the
> +		 * footprint is higher
> +		 */
> +		watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone) + (2UL << order);
> +		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are
> +		 * due to low memory or external fragmentation
> +		 *
> +		 * index of -1 implies allocations might succeed depending
> +		 * 	on watermarks
> +		 * index < 500 implies alloc failure is due to lack of memory
> +		 *
> +		 * XXX: The choice of 500 is arbitrary. Reinvestigate
> +		 *      appropriately to determine a sensible default.
> +		 *      and what it means when watermarks are also taken
> +		 *      into account. Consider making it a sysctl
> +		 */

Yes, best to make it a sysctl IMO.   It'll make optimisation far easier.
/proc/sys/vm/fragmentation_index_dont_you_dare_use_this_it_will_disappear_soon

> +		fragindex = fragmentation_index(zone, order);
> +		if (fragindex >= 0 && fragindex <= 500)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (fragindex == -1 && zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark, 0, 0)) {
> +			rc = COMPACT_PARTIAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		status = compact_zone_order(zone, order, gfp_mask);
> +		rc = max(status, rc);
> +
> +		if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark, 0, 0))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
>
> ...
>
> @@ -1765,6 +1766,31 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  
>  	cond_resched();
>  
> +	/* Try memory compaction for high-order allocations before reclaim */
> +	if (order) {
> +		*did_some_progress = try_to_compact_pages(zonelist,
> +						order, gfp_mask, nodemask);
> +		if (*did_some_progress != COMPACT_INCOMPLETE) {
> +			page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, nodemask,
> +					order, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> +					alloc_flags, preferred_zone,
> +					migratetype);
> +			if (page) {
> +				__count_vm_event(COMPACTSUCCESS);
> +				return page;
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * It's bad if compaction run occurs and fails.
> +			 * The most likely reason is that pages exist,
> +			 * but not enough to satisfy watermarks.
> +			 */
> +			count_vm_event(COMPACTFAIL);

This counter will get incremented if !__GFP_FS or !__GFP_IO.  Seems
wrong.

> +			cond_resched();
> +		}
> +	}
> +

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-24 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-23 12:25 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v5 Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm,migration: Take a reference to the anon_vma before migrating Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:22   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:04     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: Share the anon_vma ref counts between KSM and page migration Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 23:55   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] Export unusable free space index via /proc/unusable_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:14     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24  0:03   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24  0:16     ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24  0:13       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 10:25     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] Export fragmentation index via /proc/extfrag_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:37   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:56   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:15     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:33       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:58         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 19:20           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24  1:03   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24  1:47     ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24  1:53       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24  2:10         ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 10:57           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:33   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-24 20:59     ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 21:14       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-24 21:19         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 21:19       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:28         ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 21:47           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:54             ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-03-24 22:06               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-24 21:57             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-25  9:13     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:32     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:33   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 10:46     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 22:45   ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24  0:19   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 23:10   ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 11:11     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:59       ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 12:06         ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24 12:10           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:09         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:25           ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-24  1:19   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-24 11:40     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25  0:30       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25  9:48         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25  9:50           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 10:16             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26  1:03               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-26  9:40                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 20:48   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-03-25  0:57     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 18:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:39     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 19:27       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 10:37         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 19:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 20:53   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-25  9:40     ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-12 16:41 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v4 Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-03-16  2:47   ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-19  6:21   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19  6:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:10       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:22         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:09     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:08       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 15:11         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26  6:01           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100324134816.529778bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).