From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: anfei <anfei.zhou@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 3/4] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:32:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402183242.GD31723@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100402183057.GA31723@redhat.com>
Almost all ->mm == NUL checks in oom_kill.c are wrong.
The current code assumes that the task without ->mm has already
released its memory and ignores the process. However this is not
necessarily true when this process is multithreaded, other live
sub-threads can use this ->mm.
- Remove the "if (!p->mm)" check in select_bad_process(), it is
just wrong.
- Add the new helper, find_lock_task_mm(), which finds the live
thread which uses the memory and takes task_lock() to pin ->mm
- change oom_badness() to use this helper instead of just checking
->mm != NULL.
- As David pointed out, select_bad_process() must never choose the
task without ->mm, but no matter what oom_badness() returns the
task can be chosen if nothing else has been found yet.
Change oom_badness() to return int, change it to return -1 if
find_lock_task_mm() fails, and change select_bad_process() to
check points >= 0.
Note! This patch is not enough, we need more changes.
- oom_badness() was fixed, but oom_kill_task() still ignores
the task without ->mm
- oom_forkbomb_penalty() should use find_lock_task_mm() too,
and it also needs other changes to actually find the first
first-descendant children
This will be addressed later.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/oom.h | 2 +-
mm/oom_kill.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- MM/include/linux/oom.h~3_FIX_MM_CHECKS 2010-03-31 17:47:14.000000000 +0200
+++ MM/include/linux/oom.h 2010-04-02 19:14:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ enum oom_constraint {
CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
};
-extern unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
+extern int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
unsigned long totalpages, unsigned long uptime);
extern int try_set_zone_oom(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_flags);
extern void clear_zonelist_oom(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_flags);
--- MM/mm/oom_kill.c~3_FIX_MM_CHECKS 2010-04-02 18:58:37.000000000 +0200
+++ MM/mm/oom_kill.c 2010-04-02 19:55:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -69,6 +69,19 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(
return false;
}
+static struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = p;
+ do {
+ task_lock(t);
+ if (likely(t->mm))
+ return t;
+ task_unlock(t);
+ } while_each_thread(p, t);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/*
* Tasks that fork a very large number of children with seperate address spaces
* may be the result of a bug, user error, malicious applications, or even those
@@ -139,10 +152,9 @@ static unsigned long oom_forkbomb_penalt
* predictable as possible. The goal is to return the highest value for the
* task consuming the most memory to avoid subsequent oom conditions.
*/
-unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long totalpages,
+int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long totalpages,
unsigned long uptime)
{
- struct mm_struct *mm;
int points;
/*
@@ -159,19 +171,15 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_str
if (p->flags & PF_OOM_ORIGIN)
return 1000;
- task_lock(p);
- mm = p->mm;
- if (!mm) {
- task_unlock(p);
- return 0;
- }
-
+ p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!p)
+ return -1;
/*
* The baseline for the badness score is the proportion of RAM that each
* task's rss and swap space use.
*/
- points = (get_mm_rss(mm) + get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SWAPENTS)) * 1000 /
- totalpages;
+ points = (get_mm_rss(p->mm) + get_mm_counter(p->mm, MM_SWAPENTS)) *
+ 1000 / totalpages;
task_unlock(p);
points += oom_forkbomb_penalty(p);
@@ -288,7 +296,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
for_each_process(p) {
- unsigned int points;
+ int points;
/* skip the init task and kthreads */
if (is_global_init(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
@@ -330,16 +338,11 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
*ppoints = 1000;
}
- /*
- * skip the tasks which have already released their mm.
- */
- if (!p->mm)
- continue;
if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
continue;
points = oom_badness(p, totalpages, uptime.tv_sec);
- if (points > *ppoints || !chosen) {
+ if (points >= 0 && (points > *ppoints || !chosen)) {
chosen = p;
*ppoints = points;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-02 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 16:25 [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop Anfei Zhou
2010-03-25 2:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-26 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 22:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-28 14:55 ` anfei
2010-03-28 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-28 21:21 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-29 11:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-29 20:49 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed David Rientjes
2010-03-30 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-30 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 20:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 8:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 8:57 ` [patch -mm] oom: hold tasklist_lock when dumping tasks David Rientjes
2010-04-01 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 19:16 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 13:59 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 19:12 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-02 11:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 18:30 ` [PATCH -mm 0/4] oom: linux has threads Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 18:31 ` [PATCH -mm 1/4] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 19:05 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-02 18:32 ` [PATCH -mm 2/4] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-06 11:42 ` anfei
2010-04-06 12:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-06 13:05 ` anfei
2010-04-06 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-04-02 18:33 ` [PATCH -mm 4/4] oom: oom_forkbomb_penalty: move thread_group_cputime() out of task_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 19:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-05 14:23 ` [PATCH -mm] oom: select_bad_process: never choose tasks with badness == 0 Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 19:02 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed David Rientjes
2010-04-02 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 19:46 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-02 19:54 ` [patch -mm] oom: exclude tasks with badness score of 0 from being selected David Rientjes
2010-04-02 21:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-02 21:22 ` [patch -mm v2] " David Rientjes
2010-04-02 20:55 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 22:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 23:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 23:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 18:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 8:25 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 15:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-08 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-09 12:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-30 16:39 ` [PATCH] oom: fix the unsafe proc_oom_score()->badness() call Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-30 17:43 ` [PATCH -mm] proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-30 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 9:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 21:14 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 8:32 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 19:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-30 20:32 ` [PATCH] oom: fix the unsafe proc_oom_score()->badness() call David Rientjes
2010-03-31 9:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-31 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 7:41 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01 13:13 ` [PATCH 0/1] oom: fix the unsafe usage of badness() in proc_oom_score() Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 13:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2010-04-01 19:03 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-29 14:06 ` [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop anfei
2010-03-29 20:01 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-30 14:29 ` anfei
2010-03-30 20:29 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-31 6:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 6:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-31 6:30 ` Balbir Singh
2010-03-31 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-31 7:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 6:32 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 7:08 ` [patch -mm] memcg: make oom killer a no-op when no killable task can be found David Rientjes
2010-03-31 7:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-31 8:04 ` Balbir Singh
2010-03-31 10:38 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-04 23:28 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-05 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-05 22:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-05 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-05 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-06 12:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 21:47 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-07 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-07 13:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-08 18:05 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-21 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-21 22:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-22 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-22 8:34 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-27 22:58 ` [patch -mm] oom: reintroduce and deprecate oom_kill_allocating_task David Rientjes
2010-04-28 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-22 7:23 ` [patch -mm] memcg: make oom killer a no-op when no killable task can be found Nick Piggin
2010-04-22 7:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-22 10:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-22 10:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-22 21:11 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-22 10:28 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-22 15:39 ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-22 21:09 ` David Rientjes
2010-05-04 23:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-08 17:36 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-02 10:17 ` [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop Mel Gorman
2010-04-04 23:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-05 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-06 22:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-29 11:31 ` anfei
2010-03-29 11:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-29 12:09 ` anfei
2010-03-28 2:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100402183242.GD31723@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anfei.zhou@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).