linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] mm,migration: Allow the migration of PageSwapCache pages
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:06:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100406170623.50631eb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270224168-14775-15-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On Fri,  2 Apr 2010 17:02:48 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> PageAnon pages that are unmapped may or may not have an anon_vma so are
> not currently migrated. However, a swap cache page can be migrated and
> fits this description. This patch identifies page swap caches and allows
> them to be migrated but ensures that no attempt to made to remap the pages
> would would potentially try to access an already freed anon_vma.
> 
> ...
>
> @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ static int fallback_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
>   *   < 0 - error code
>   *  == 0 - success
>   */
> -static int move_to_new_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *page)
> +static int move_to_new_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
> +						int remap_swapcache)

You're not a fan of `bool'.

>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping;
>  	int rc;
> @@ -519,10 +520,12 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *page)
>  	else
>  		rc = fallback_migrate_page(mapping, newpage, page);
>  
> -	if (!rc)
> -		remove_migration_ptes(page, newpage);
> -	else
> +	if (rc) {
>  		newpage->mapping = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		if (remap_swapcache) 
> +			remove_migration_ptes(page, newpage);
> +	}
>  
>  	unlock_page(newpage);
>  
> @@ -539,6 +542,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
>  	int rc = 0;
>  	int *result = NULL;
>  	struct page *newpage = get_new_page(page, private, &result);
> +	int remap_swapcache = 1;
>  	int rcu_locked = 0;
>  	int charge = 0;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
> @@ -600,18 +604,27 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
>  		rcu_read_lock();
>  		rcu_locked = 1;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * If the page has no mappings any more, just bail. An
> -		 * unmapped anon page is likely to be freed soon but worse,
> -		 * it's possible its anon_vma disappeared between when
> -		 * the page was isolated and when we reached here while
> -		 * the RCU lock was not held
> -		 */
> -		if (!page_mapped(page))
> -			goto rcu_unlock;
> +		/* Determine how to safely use anon_vma */
> +		if (!page_mapped(page)) {
> +			if (!PageSwapCache(page))
> +				goto rcu_unlock;
>  
> -		anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page);
> -		atomic_inc(&anon_vma->external_refcount);
> +			/*
> +			 * We cannot be sure that the anon_vma of an unmapped
> +			 * swapcache page is safe to use.

Why not?  A full explanation here would be nice.

> 			   In this case, the
> +			 * swapcache page gets migrated but the pages are not
> +			 * remapped
> +			 */
> +			remap_swapcache = 0;
> +		} else { 
> +			/*
> +			 * Take a reference count on the anon_vma if the
> +			 * page is mapped so that it is guaranteed to
> +			 * exist when the page is remapped later
> +			 */
> +			anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page);
> +			atomic_inc(&anon_vma->external_refcount);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -646,9 +659,9 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
>  
>  skip_unmap:
>  	if (!page_mapped(page))
> -		rc = move_to_new_page(newpage, page);
> +		rc = move_to_new_page(newpage, page, remap_swapcache);
>  
> -	if (rc)
> +	if (rc && remap_swapcache)
>  		remove_migration_ptes(page, page);
>  rcu_unlock:

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-07  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-02 16:02 [PATCH 0/14] Memory Compaction v7 Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/14] mm,migration: Take a reference to the anon_vma before migrating Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07  9:56     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/14] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/14] mm: Share the anon_vma ref counts between KSM and page migration Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07  0:10     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-07 10:01     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/14] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 10:22     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/14] Export unusable free space index via /proc/unusable_index Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 10:35     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 12:42     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/14] Export fragmentation index via /proc/extfrag_index Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 10:46     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 12:43     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/14] Move definition for LRU isolation modes to a header Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/14] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 15:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-08 16:59   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-08 17:06     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/14] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 15:39     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-07 18:27       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/14] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07  0:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-06 21:56       ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07  1:19         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-07 15:42     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/14] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:06   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 16:06     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-07 18:29     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 12/14] Add a tunable that decides when memory should be compacted and when it should be reclaimed Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:06   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07 16:11     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 13/14] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-04-07  0:06   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-07  0:55     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-07 16:32     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 14/14] mm,migration: Allow the migration of PageSwapCache pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-06  6:54   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-06 15:37   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-07  0:06   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-07 16:49     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-06 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/14] Memory Compaction v7 Tarkan Erimer
2010-04-06 15:00   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-06 15:03     ` Tarkan Erimer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-30  9:14 [PATCH 0/14] Memory Compaction v6 Mel Gorman
2010-03-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 14/14] mm,migration: Allow the migration of PageSwapCache pages Mel Gorman
2010-03-31  5:26   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-31 11:27     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-31 23:57       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-01  2:39         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-01  2:43     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-01  3:01       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-01  4:44         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-01  5:42           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-01 10:51             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-01 17:36               ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02  0:20                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-02  8:51                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-02  0:21                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-02  8:52                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-01  9:30           ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-01 10:42             ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100406170623.50631eb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).