From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B306B01F0 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:03:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100407.000343.181989028.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: Arch specific mmap attributes From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100407095145.FB70.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100406185246.7E63.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1270592111.13812.88.camel@pasglop> <20100407095145.FB70.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:03:45 +0900 (JST) > I'm not against changing kernel internal. I only disagree mmu > attribute fashion will be become used widely. Desktop already uses similar features via PCI mmap attributes and such, not to mention MSR settings on x86. So I disagree with your assesment that this is some HPC/embedded issue. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org