From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Taras Glek <tglek@mozilla.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:13:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407081351.GA20322@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g2q28c262361004070106le671ad63u965e8137ad2e4f41@mail.gmail.com>
Minchan,
> A few month ago, I saw your patch about enhancing readahead.
> At that time, many guys tested several size of USB and SSD which are
> consist of nand device.
> The result is good if we does readahead untile some crossover point.
> So I think we need readahead about file I/O in non-rotation device, too.
>
> But startup latency is important than file I/O performance in some machine.
> With analysis at that time, code readahead of application affected slow startup.
> In addition, during bootup, cache hit ratio was very small.
>
> So I hoped we can disable readahead just only code section(ie, roughly
> exec vma's filemap fault). :)
>
> I don't want you to solve this problem right now.
> Just let you understand embedded system's some problem
> for enhancing readahead in future. :)
Yeah, I've never heard of such a demand, definitely good to know it!
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4BBA6776.5060804@mozilla.com>
2010-04-06 9:51 ` Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup Johannes Weiner
2010-04-06 21:57 ` Taras Glek
2010-04-06 22:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-06 22:39 ` Taras Glek
2010-04-07 2:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-07 2:54 ` Taras Glek
2010-04-07 4:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-07 7:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-07 7:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-07 7:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-07 8:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-07 8:13 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-04-07 7:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-08 17:44 ` Taras Glek
2010-04-12 2:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-12 3:25 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-12 4:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-12 4:43 ` drepper
2010-04-12 4:46 ` Taras Glek
2010-04-12 4:50 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100407081351.GA20322@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=tglek@mozilla.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).