From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][mm][PATCH] fix migration race in rmap_walk
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:36:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426113640.GA8459@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r2o28c262361004260248s62729484g14a720d37d5916f7@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:48:42PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:28 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:49:01 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:43:24 +0100
> >> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> >
> >> > It looks nice but it still broke after 28 hours of running. The
> >> > seq-counter is still insufficient to catch all changes that are made to
> >> > the list. I'm beginning to wonder if a) this really can be fully safely
> >> > locked with the anon_vma changes and b) if it has to be a spinlock to
> >> > catch the majority of cases but still a lazy cleanup if there happens to
> >> > be a race. It's unsatisfactory and I'm expecting I'll either have some
> >> > insight to the new anon_vma changes that allow it to be locked or Rik
> >> > knows how to restore the original behaviour which as Andrea pointed out
> >> > was safe.
> >> >
> >> Ouch.
> >
> > Ok, reproduced. Here is status in my test + printk().
> >
> > * A race doesn't seem to happen if swap=off.
> > I need to swapon to cause the bug
>
> FYI,
>
> Do you have a swapon/off bomb test?
> When I saw your mail, I feel it might be culprit.
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/22/762.
>
> It is just guessing. I don't have a time to look into, now.
>
I haven't tried a swapon/off test but that patch is certainly important
and closes an important race. A fork-heavy test will routinely hit the
problem and applying the patch makes it very difficult to reproduce the
problem. I've added it to my stack while I continue trying to pin down
when the VMA-changes make a difference.
I'm relooking at the seq counter approach. It appears to very rare the logic
is actually triggered so reproducing is a problem. I'm still not convinced
that just locking anon_vma is not the answer there. If it locks and as
expand_downwards already locks and with the fork-based patch, I think the
races might be closed but I'm not 100% certain yet.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 3:01 [BUGFIX][mm][PATCH] fix migration race in rmap_walk KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-23 5:11 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-23 5:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-23 7:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-23 7:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-23 7:53 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-23 7:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-23 9:59 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-23 15:58 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-24 2:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-24 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-25 23:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-26 2:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-26 4:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-26 4:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-26 9:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-26 9:48 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-26 9:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-26 10:07 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-26 11:36 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-04-26 4:00 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100426113640.GA8459@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).