From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
eric.whitney@hp.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix3
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 11:07:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503150708.15039.67683.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503150455.15039.10178.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
Incremental patch 2 to
numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id
in 28april10 mmotm.
Remove the "#define numa_mem numa_node" when !HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
from topology.h per Tejun Heo. Because 'numa_mem' is [was] a percpu
variable, we cannot make it a macro with arguments or a static inline
function. I considered making it a variable alias for numa_node, but
since both are percpu variables whose actual definitions and declarations
are buried deep in the DECLARE_PER_CPU() macros, I proposed a
DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIAS(variable, alias). Tejun agreed that if this
were a common occurrence, that would be a good idea, but since we
currently have only this instance, we agreed to just eliminate
the numa_mem variable when !HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES.
This patch renames the variable to _numa_mem_ and adds warnings
in both linux/topology.h and mm/page_alloc.c against referencing
the variable directly. The accessor functions numa_mem_id() and
cpu_to_mem() will return the appropriate value when
!HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES.
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
include/linux/topology.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
mm/page_alloc.c | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653/include/linux/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653.orig/include/linux/topology.h
+++ linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -253,46 +253,65 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, numa_mem);
+/*
+ * N.B., Do NOT reference the '_numa_mem_' per cpu variable directly.
+ * It will not be defined when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is not defined.
+ * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem().
+ */
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_);
#ifndef set_numa_mem
static inline void set_numa_mem(int node)
{
- percpu_write(numa_mem, node);
+ percpu_write(_numa_mem_, node);
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifndef numa_mem_id
+/* Returns the number of the nearest Node with memory */
+static inline int numa_mem_id(void)
+{
+ return __this_cpu_read(_numa_mem_);
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifndef cpu_to_mem
+static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
+{
+ return per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu);
}
#endif
#ifndef set_cpu_numa_mem
static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node)
{
- per_cpu(numa_mem, cpu) = node;
+ per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node;
}
#endif
#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES */
-#define numa_mem numa_node
static inline void set_numa_mem(int node) {}
static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node) {}
-#endif /* [!]CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES */
-
#ifndef numa_mem_id
/* Returns the number of the nearest Node with memory */
static inline int numa_mem_id(void)
{
- return __this_cpu_read(numa_mem);
+ return numa_node_id();
}
#endif
#ifndef cpu_to_mem
static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
{
- return per_cpu(numa_mem, cpu);
+ return cpu_to_node(cpu);
}
#endif
+#endif /* [!]CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES */
+
#ifndef topology_physical_package_id
#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) ((void)(cpu), -1)
#endif
Index: linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm-100428-1653/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -63,8 +63,14 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(numa_node);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, numa_mem); /* Kernel "local memory" node */
-EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(numa_mem);
+/*
+ * N.B., Do NOT reference the '_numa_mem_' per cpu variable directly.
+ * It will not be defined when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is not defined.
+ * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem()
+ * defined in <linux/topology.h>.
+ */
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_); /* Kernel "local memory" node */
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(_numa_mem_);
#endif
/*
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 15:04 [PATCH 0/7] numa: incremental fixes to generic per cpu numa_*_id() series Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] numa-add-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1 Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] numa-add-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2 Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-03 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1 Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-21 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-24 14:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 14:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-24 14:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 18:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-24 19:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 20:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 15:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2 Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-03 15:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix2 Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-03 15:07 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2010-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] numa-update-documentation-vm-numa-add-memoryless-node-info-fix1 Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503150708.15039.67683.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).