From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com,
gregory.haskins@gmail.com, s.hetze@linux-ag.com,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: virtio: put last_used and last_avail index into ring itself.
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 11:57:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100509085733.GD16775@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005071235.40590.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:35:39PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010 03:57:55 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:22:12AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 May 2010 03:52:36 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I think everyone is settled on 128 byte cache lines for the forseeable
> > > future, so it's not really an issue.
> >
> > You mean with 64 bit descriptors we will be bouncing a cache line
> > between host and guest, anyway?
>
> I'm confused by this entire thread.
>
> Descriptors are 16 bytes. They are at the start, so presumably aligned to
> cache boundaries.
>
> Available ring follows that at 2 bytes per entry, so it's also packed nicely
> into cachelines.
>
> Then there's padding to page boundary. That puts us on a cacheline again
> for the used ring; also 2 bytes per entry.
>
Hmm, is used ring really 2 bytes per entry?
/* u32 is used here for ids for padding reasons. */
struct vring_used_elem {
/* Index of start of used descriptor chain. */
__u32 id;
/* Total length of the descriptor chain which was used (written to) */
__u32 len;
};
struct vring_used {
__u16 flags;
__u16 idx;
struct vring_used_elem ring[];
};
> I don't see how any change in layout could be more cache friendly?
> Rusty.
I thought that used ring has 8 bytes per entry, and that struct
vring_used is aligned at page boundary, this
would mean that ring element is at offset 4 bytes from page boundary.
Thus with cacheline size 128 bytes, each 4th element crosses
a cacheline boundary. If we had a 4 byte padding after idx, each
used element would always be completely within a single cacheline.
What am I missing?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-09 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1257349249.git.mst@redhat.com>
2009-11-04 15:55 ` [PATCHv8 1/3] tun: export underlying socket Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-04 15:55 ` [PATCHv8 2/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-04 15:57 ` [PATCHv8 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-06 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-08 11:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-09 6:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-09 7:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-10 1:08 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-09 7:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-09 11:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-04 18:22 ` virtio: put last_used and last_avail index into ring itself Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-06 0:52 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-06 6:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-07 3:05 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-09 8:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-05-10 3:11 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100509085733.GD16775@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=s.hetze@linux-ag.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).