From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 184046B01EE for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 01:43:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:26 +0900 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [RFC,2/7] NUMA Hotplug emulator Message-ID: <20100514054226.GB12002@linux-sh.org> References: <20100513114544.GC2169@shaohui> <20100514111615.c7ca63a5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100514111615.c7ca63a5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Shaohui Zheng , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.co, fengguang.wu@intel.com, haicheng.li@linux.intel.com, shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com List-ID: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16:15AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:45:44 +0800 > Shaohui Zheng wrote: > > > x86: infrastructure of NUMA hotplug emulation > > > > Hmm. do we have to create this for x86 only ? > Can't we live with lmb ? as > > lmb_hide_node() or some. > > IIUC, x86-version lmb is now under development. > Indeed. There is very little x86-specific about this patch series at all except for the e820 bits and tying in the CPU topology. Most of what this series is doing wrapping around e820 could be done on top of LMB, which would also make it possible to use on non-x86 architectures. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org