Re: [RFC, 3/7] NUMA hotplug emulator

[Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 01:32:02PM +0800, Haicheng Li wrote:
> Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >> Pls. replace it with following code:
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NODE_HOTPLUG_EMU
> >> +static ssize_t store_nodes_probe(struct sysdev_class *class,
> >> +                                 struct sysdev_class_attribute *attr,
> >> +                                 const char *buf, size_t count)
> >> +{
> >> +       long nid;
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = strict_strtol(buf, 0, &nid);
> >> +       if (ret == -EINVAL)
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = hotadd_hidden_nodes(nid);
> >> +       if (!ret)
> >> +               return count;
> >> +       else
> >> +               return -EIO;
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > How about this?
> > 
> >        err = strict_strtol(buf, 0, &nid);
> >        if (err < 0)
> >                return err;
> 
> other negative value would be odd here.

Yes, strict_strtoul() will be better.

> >        err = hotadd_hidden_nodes(nid);
> >        if (err < 0)
> >                return err;
> 
> hotadd_hidden_nodes could return -EEXIST, which is also odd here, right?

Why not? write(2) says "Other errors may occur, depending on the
object connected to fd."

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>