From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5B96B020A for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 04:10:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4E87cTR009837 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:37:38 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4E87cnG3383532 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:37:38 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4E87bNa017752 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 18:07:38 +1000 Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 13:37:32 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [RFC,2/7] NUMA Hotplug emulator Message-ID: <20100514080732.GC3296@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20100513114544.GC2169@shaohui> <20100514111615.c7ca63a5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100514054226.GB12002@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100514054226.GB12002@linux-sh.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Paul Mundt Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Shaohui Zheng , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.co, fengguang.wu@intel.com, haicheng.li@linux.intel.com, shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com List-ID: * Paul Mundt [2010-05-14 14:42:26]: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16:15AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:45:44 +0800 > > Shaohui Zheng wrote: > > > > > x86: infrastructure of NUMA hotplug emulation > > > > > > > Hmm. do we have to create this for x86 only ? > > Can't we live with lmb ? as > > > > lmb_hide_node() or some. > > > > IIUC, x86-version lmb is now under development. > > > Indeed. There is very little x86-specific about this patch series at all > except for the e820 bits and tying in the CPU topology. Most of what this > series is doing wrapping around e820 could be done on top of LMB, which > would also make it possible to use on non-x86 architectures. > Yes, that would be very nice addition -- Three Cheers, Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org