linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	williams@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:50:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100528142048.GF5579@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100528140623.GA11041@barrios-desktop>

* MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> [2010-05-28 23:06:23]:

> > I confess I failed to distinguish memcg OOM and system OOM and used "in
> > case of OOM kill the selected task the faster you can" as the guideline.
> > If the exit code path is short that shouldn't be a problem.
> > 
> > Maybe the right way to go would be giving the dying task the biggest
> > priority inside that memcg to be sure that it will be the next process from
> > that memcg to be scheduled. Would that be reasonable?
> 
> Hmm. I can't understand your point. 
> What do you mean failing distinguish memcg and system OOM?
> 
> We already have been distinguish it by mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
> (but we have to enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR). 
> So task selected in select_bad_process is one out of memcg's tasks when 
> memcg have a memory pressure. 
>

We have a routine to help figure out if the task belongs to the memory
cgroup that cause the OOM. The OOM entry from memory cgroup is
different from a regular one. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-28 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-27 18:04 [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-27 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-28  2:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28  3:51     ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28  4:33       ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-28  4:46         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28  5:30           ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28  5:39             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28  5:50               ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28  5:59                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28  7:52                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 12:53                   ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 14:06                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 14:20                       ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2010-05-28 15:03                         ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 14:36                       ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 15:12                         ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 15:21                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-28 15:35                             ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 15:28                           ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 15:45                             ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 16:48                               ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-29  3:59                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31  2:15                                   ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-31  5:06                                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  6:35                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31  7:05                                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  7:25                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31  9:30                                           ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-30 15:09                                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  0:21                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31  5:01                                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  5:04                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31  5:46                                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  5:54                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31  6:09                                           ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  6:51                                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 10:33                                               ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 13:52                                               ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-31 23:50                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-01 17:35                                                   ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-06-01 20:49                                                     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 13:54                                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 14:20                                                         ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-06-02 21:11                                                         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 23:36                                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  0:52                                                             ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  7:50                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-03 20:32                                                             ` David Rientjes
2010-06-01  8:19                                                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-01 18:36                                                   ` David Rientjes
2010-05-28  6:27           ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-28  6:34             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-28  6:38             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 15:53       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100528142048.GF5579@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).