From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
williams@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:50:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100528142048.GF5579@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100528140623.GA11041@barrios-desktop>
* MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> [2010-05-28 23:06:23]:
> > I confess I failed to distinguish memcg OOM and system OOM and used "in
> > case of OOM kill the selected task the faster you can" as the guideline.
> > If the exit code path is short that shouldn't be a problem.
> >
> > Maybe the right way to go would be giving the dying task the biggest
> > priority inside that memcg to be sure that it will be the next process from
> > that memcg to be scheduled. Would that be reasonable?
>
> Hmm. I can't understand your point.
> What do you mean failing distinguish memcg and system OOM?
>
> We already have been distinguish it by mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
> (but we have to enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR).
> So task selected in select_bad_process is one out of memcg's tasks when
> memcg have a memory pressure.
>
We have a routine to help figure out if the task belongs to the memory
cgroup that cause the OOM. The OOM entry from memory cgroup is
different from a regular one.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 18:04 [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-27 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-28 2:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 3:51 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 4:33 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-28 4:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 5:30 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 5:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 5:50 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 5:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 7:52 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 12:53 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 14:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 14:20 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2010-05-28 15:03 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 14:36 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 15:12 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-28 15:35 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 15:28 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-28 15:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-28 16:48 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-29 3:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31 2:15 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-31 5:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31 7:05 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 7:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 9:30 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-30 15:09 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 0:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 5:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 5:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 5:46 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 5:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 6:09 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 6:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-31 10:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31 13:52 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-05-31 23:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-01 17:35 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-06-01 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 13:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 14:20 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2010-06-02 21:11 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 23:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03 0:52 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-03 20:32 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-01 8:19 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-01 18:36 ` David Rientjes
2010-05-28 6:27 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-28 6:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-28 6:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-28 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100528142048.GF5579@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).