From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF7F6B01AF for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:15:32 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch -mm 08/18] oom: badness heuristic rewrite Message-Id: <20100603161532.8e41b42a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100603104314.723D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100602222347.F527.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100603104314.723D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: David Rientjes , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Oleg Nesterov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:07:50 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > In other word, I'm sure I'll continue to get OOM bug report in future. You must have some reason for believing that. Please share it with us. Even better: apply the patches and run some tests. If you believe there are new failure modes then surely you can quickly prepare a testcase which demonstrates them. Or just suggest a test case - I expect David will be able to test it. Again: without hard, tangible engineering facts I cannot take comments such as the above into account. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org