linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: Make coredump interruptible
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:53:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100609195309.GA6899@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100604112721.GA12582@redhat.com>

On 06/04, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/04, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > In multi threaded OOM case, we have two problematic routine, coredump
> > and vmscan. Roland's idea can only solve the former.
> >
> > But I also interest vmscan quickly exit if OOM received.
>
> Yes, agreed. See another email from me, MMF_ flags looks "obviously
> useful" to me.

Well. But somehow we forgot about the !coredumping case... Suppose
that select_bad_process() chooses the process P to kill and we have
other processes (not sub-threads) which share the same ->mm.

In that case I am not sure we should blindly set MMF_OOMKILL. Suppose
that we kill P and after that the "out-of-memory" condition goes away.
But its ->mm still has MMF_OOMKILL set, and it is used. Who/when will
clear this flag?

Perhaps something like below makes sense for now.

Oleg.

--- x/fs/exec.c
+++ x/fs/exec.c
@@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas
 	spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
 	if (!signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
 		mm->core_state = core_state;
+		set_bit(MMF_COREDUMP, &mm->flags);
 		nr = zap_process(tsk, exit_code);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
--- x/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ x/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -2028,6 +2028,9 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump
 			struct page *page;
 			int stop;
 
+			if (!test_bit(MMF_COREDUMP, &current->mm->flags))
+				goto end_coredump;
+
 			page = get_dump_page(addr);
 			if (page) {
 				void *kaddr = kmap(page);
--- x/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ x/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_task(struct task_
 	p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
 	set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
 
+	clear_bit(MMF_COREDUMP, &p->mm->flags);
 	force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-09 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-31  9:33 [PATCH 1/5] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31  9:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31 16:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-01  1:10     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01 20:18       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 13:54         ` [PATCH] oom: remove PF_EXITING check completely KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 15:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 21:02             ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03  4:48               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:29                 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 13:54         ` [PATCH] oom: Make coredump interruptible KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 15:42           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 17:29             ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-02 17:53               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 18:58                 ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-02 20:38                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 14:03                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 10:54                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-04 11:27                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 11:34                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-09 19:53                         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-06-09 20:41                           ` David Rientjes
2010-06-09 21:03                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-13 11:24                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-13 15:53                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-13 17:13                               ` uninterruptible CLONE_VFORK (Was: oom: Make coredump interruptible) Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-14  0:56                                 ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-14 16:33                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-14 19:17                                     ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-28 17:33                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-28 18:04                                         ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-14  0:36                               ` [PATCH] oom: Make coredump interruptible Roland McGrath
2010-06-14  0:26                     ` Roland McGrath
2010-06-01 20:39   ` [PATCH 2/5] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account David Rientjes
2010-05-31  9:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01  0:57   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-01 20:42   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 16:05   ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-31  9:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] oom: the points calculation of child processes must use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31 16:56   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-31 23:48     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-31  9:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] oom: __oom_kill_task() " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-01  1:02   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-01 20:44   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-01  0:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-01 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-01 21:20   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-01 21:26     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 13:54       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-02 21:09         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 21:33           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-02 21:46             ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 14:27               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:11                 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-02 15:32 ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100609195309.GA6899@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).