From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] oom: give the dying task a higher priority
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:54:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616195447.GH5009@uudg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100616153120.GH9278@barrios-desktop>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:31:20AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
| > /*
| > * We give our sacrificial lamb high priority and access to
| > * all the memory it needs. That way it should be able to
| > * exit() and clear out its resources quickly...
| > */
| > p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
| > set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
...
| > + if (rt_task(p)) {
| > + p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
| > + return;
I am not sure the code above will have any real effect for an RT task.
Kosaki-san, was this change motivated by test results or was it just a code
cleanup? I ask that out of curiosity.
| I have a question from long time ago.
| If we change rt.time_slice _without_ setscheduler, is it effective?
| I mean scheduler pick up the task faster than other normal task?
$ git log --pretty=oneline -Stime_slice mm/oom_kill.c
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
This code ("time_slice = HZ;") is around for quite a while and
probably comes from a time where having a big time slice was enough to be
sure you would be the next on the line. I would say sched_setscheduler is
indeed necessary.
Regards,
Luis
--
[ Luis Claudio R. Goncalves Red Hat - Realtime Team ]
[ Fingerprint: 4FDD B8C4 3C59 34BD 8BE9 2696 7203 D980 A448 C8F8 ]
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-16 11:29 [PATCH 1/9] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] oom: rename badness() to oom_badness() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 14:46 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-16 21:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] oom: oom_kill_process() doesn't select kthread child KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:02 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] oom: oom_kill_process() need to check p is unkillable KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:07 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 5/9] oom: make oom_unkillable_task() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:10 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-16 11:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] oom: use same_thread_group instead comparing ->mm KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:15 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] oom: unify CAP_SYS_RAWIO check into other superuser check KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 11:35 ` [PATCH 8/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:22 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-16 11:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] oom: give the dying task a higher priority KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-16 19:54 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves [this message]
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-16 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child Minchan Kim
2010-06-17 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616195447.GH5009@uudg.org \
--to=lclaudio@uudg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).