Re: [RFC/T/D][PATCH 2/2] Linux/Guest cooperative unmapped page cache control

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> [2010-06-16 14:39:02]:

> >We're talking about an environment which we're always trying to
> >optimize.  Imagine that we're always trying to consolidate guests on to
> >smaller numbers of hosts.  We're effectively in a state where we
> >_always_ want new guests.
> 
> If this came at no cost to the guests, you'd be right.  But at some
> point guest performance will be hit by this, so the advantage gained
> from freeing memory will be balanced by the disadvantage.
> 
> Also, memory is not the only resource.  At some point you become cpu
> bound; at that point freeing memory doesn't help and in fact may
> increase your cpu load.
>

We'll probably need control over other resources as well, but IMHO
memory is the most precious because it is non-renewable. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>