From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Implement balance_dirty_pages() through waiting for flusher thread
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:27:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100622132735.GC3338@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100622040727.GA14340@localhost>
On Tue 22-06-10 12:07:27, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 18-06-10 12:21:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 20:04 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > + if (bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITTEN) >= bdi->wb_written_head)
> > > > + bdi_wakeup_writers(bdi);
> > >
> > > For the paranoid amongst us you could make wb_written_head s64 and write
> > > the above as:
> > >
> > > if (bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITTEN) - bdi->wb_written_head > 0)
> > >
> > > Which, if you assume both are monotonic and wb_written_head is always
> > > within 2^63 of the actual bdi_stat() value, should give the same end
> > > result and deal with wrap-around.
> > >
> > > For when we manage to create a device that can write 2^64 pages in our
> > > uptime :-)
> > OK, the fix is simple enough so I've changed it, although I'm not
> > paranoic enough ;) (I actually did the math before writing that test).
>
> a bit more change :)
>
> type:
>
> - u64 wb_written_head
> + s64 wb_written_head
>
> resetting:
>
> - bdi->wb_written_head = ~(u64)0;
> + bdi->wb_written_head = 0;
>
> setting:
>
> bdi->wb_written_head = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITTEN) + wc->written;
> + bdi->wb_written_head |= 1;
>
> testing:
>
> if (bdi->wb_written_head &&
> bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITTEN) - bdi->wb_written_head > 0)
>
> This avoids calling into bdi_wakeup_writers() pointlessly when no one
> is being throttled (which is the normal case).
Actually, I've already changed wb_written_head to s64. I kept setting
wb_written_head to s64 maximum. That also avoids calling into
bdi_wakeup_writers() unnecessarily...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-17 18:04 [PATCH RFC] mm: Implement balance_dirty_pages() through waiting for flusher thread Jan Kara
2010-06-18 6:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-18 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-18 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-21 23:36 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 5:44 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-22 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-22 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-22 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-22 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-22 10:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-22 13:17 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 13:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-22 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-22 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 14:02 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 14:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-23 13:15 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-23 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-22 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-22 14:38 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-23 1:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-23 3:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-23 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-23 6:03 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-23 6:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-23 23:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-22 14:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 11:19 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-18 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-21 13:31 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-18 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-21 14:02 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-21 14:10 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-21 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-18 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-21 13:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 4:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 13:27 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-06-22 13:33 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100622132735.GC3338@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).