[PATCH 0/7] memcg reclaim tracepoint

[PATCH 0/7] memcg reclaim tracepoint

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Recently, Mel Gorman added some vmscan tracepoint. but they can't
trace memcg. So, This patch series does.


following three patches are nit fix and cleanups.

  memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized
  memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask
  memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

following four patches are tracepoint conversion and adding memcg tracepoints.

  vmscan:        convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT
  memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint
  vmscan:        convert mm_vmscan_lru_isolate to DEFINE_EVENT
  memcg, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint


diffstat
================
 include/linux/memcontrol.h    |    6 ++--
 include/linux/mmzone.h        |    5 +++
 include/linux/swap.h          |    3 +-
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 mm/memcontrol.c               |   15 +++++---
 mm/vmscan.c                   |   35 ++++++++++++------
 6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)


Sameple output is here.
=========================

              dd-1851  [001]   158.837763: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
              dd-1851  [001]   158.837783: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
              dd-1851  [001]   158.837860: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
  (...)
              dd-1970  [000]   266.608235: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=0 zid=1 order=0
              dd-1970  [000]   266.608239: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=1 zid=1 order=0
              dd-1970  [000]   266.608248: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=2 zid=1 order=0
         kswapd1-348   [001]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=1 order=0
              dd-1970  [000]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=3 zid=1 order=0
         kswapd3-350   [000]   266.608266: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=3 order=0
  (...)
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328891: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328897: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328915: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328989: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.329019: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.330562: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
  (...)
         kswapd2-349   [001]   267.407081: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=2
         kswapd3-350   [001]   267.408077: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=3
         kswapd1-348   [000]   267.427858: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=1
         kswapd0-347   [001]   267.430064: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=0





--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
it doesn't reclaim any pages.

This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 						struct zone *zone, int nid)
 {
 	struct scan_control sc = {
+		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
 		.may_swap = !noswap,
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:13:31 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
> It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
> it doesn't reclaim any pages.
> 
> This patch fixes it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						struct zone *zone, int nid)
>  {
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
> +		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
>  		.may_swap = !noswap,
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:13:31PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
> It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
> it doesn't reclaim any pages.
> 

Do you mean it immediately returns once one page is reclaimed? i.e. this
check

               if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
                        break;


> This patch fixes it.
> 

Otherwise it seems ok. It's unrelated to trace points though so should
be submitted on its own.

> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						struct zone *zone, int nid)
>  {
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
> +		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
>  		.may_swap = !noswap,
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:13:31PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
> > It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
> > it doesn't reclaim any pages.
> > 
> 
> Do you mean it immediately returns once one page is reclaimed? i.e. this
> check
> 
>                if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
>                         break;

Strictly speaking, once SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX batch is scanned. no need
to reclaim pages at all.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[Balbir Singh]

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:13:31]:

> Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
> It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
> it doesn't reclaim any pages.
> 
> This patch fixes it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						struct zone *zone, int nid)
>  {
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
> +		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
>  		.may_swap = !noswap,

Could you please do some additional testing on

1. How far does this push pages (in terms of when limit is hit)?
2. Did you hit a problem with the current setting or is it a review
fix?


-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:13:31]:
> 
> > Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
> > It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
> > it doesn't reclaim any pages.
> > 
> > This patch fixes it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >  						struct zone *zone, int nid)
> >  {
> >  	struct scan_control sc = {
> > +		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> >  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> >  		.may_unmap = 1,
> >  		.may_swap = !noswap,
> 
> Could you please do some additional testing on
> 
> 1. How far does this push pages (in terms of when limit is hit)?

32 pages per mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone().

That said, the algorithm is here.

1. call mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node()
   calculate largest cgroup
2. call mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() and shrink 32 pages
3. goto 1 if limit is still exceed.

If it's not your intention, can you please your intended algorithm?


> 2. Did you hit a problem with the current setting or is it a review
> fix?

I've found this by review. and my patch works fine on my test environment.
Of cource, if you do _not_ run the code on heavy pressure, your original code
works too.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[Balbir Singh]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:03 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:13:31]:
>>
>> > Currently, mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() initialize sc.nr_to_reclaim as 0.
>> > It mean shrink_zone() only scan 32 pages and immediately return even if
>> > it doesn't reclaim any pages.
>> >
>> > This patch fixes it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> > ---
>> >  mm/vmscan.c |    1 +
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > index 1691ad0..bd1d035 100644
>> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > @@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>> >                                             struct zone *zone, int nid)
>> >  {
>> >     struct scan_control sc = {
>> > +           .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>> >             .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>> >             .may_unmap = 1,
>> >             .may_swap = !noswap,
>>
>> Could you please do some additional testing on
>>
>> 1. How far does this push pages (in terms of when limit is hit)?
>
> 32 pages per mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone().
>
> That said, the algorithm is here.
>
> 1. call mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node()
>   calculate largest cgroup
> 2. call mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() and shrink 32 pages
> 3. goto 1 if limit is still exceed.
>
> If it's not your intention, can you please your intended algorithm?

We set it to 0, since we care only about a single page reclaim on
hitting the limit. IIRC, in the past we saw an excessive pushback on
reclaiming SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages, just wanted to check if you are
seeing the same behaviour even now after your changes.

Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> >> 1. How far does this push pages (in terms of when limit is hit)?
> >
> > 32 pages per mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone().
> >
> > That said, the algorithm is here.
> >
> > 1. call mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node()
> >   calculate largest cgroup
> > 2. call mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() and shrink 32 pages
> > 3. goto 1 if limit is still exceed.
> >
> > If it's not your intention, can you please your intended algorithm?
> 
> We set it to 0, since we care only about a single page reclaim on
> hitting the limit. IIRC, in the past we saw an excessive pushback on
> reclaiming SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages, just wanted to check if you are
> seeing the same behaviour even now after your changes.

Actually, we have 32 pages reclaim batch size. (see nr_scan_try_batch() and related functions)
thus <32 value doesn't works as your intended.

But, If you run your test again, and (if there is) report any bugs. I'm very glad and fix it soon.

Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized

[Balbir Singh]

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> >> 1. How far does this push pages (in terms of when limit is hit)?
>> >
>> > 32 pages per mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone().
>> >
>> > That said, the algorithm is here.
>> >
>> > 1. call mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node()
>> >   calculate largest cgroup
>> > 2. call mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() and shrink 32 pages
>> > 3. goto 1 if limit is still exceed.
>> >
>> > If it's not your intention, can you please your intended algorithm?
>>
>> We set it to 0, since we care only about a single page reclaim on
>> hitting the limit. IIRC, in the past we saw an excessive pushback on
>> reclaiming SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages, just wanted to check if you are
>> seeing the same behaviour even now after your changes.
>
> Actually, we have 32 pages reclaim batch size. (see nr_scan_try_batch() and related functions)
> thus <32 value doesn't works as your intended.
>
> But, If you run your test again, and (if there is) report any bugs. I'm very glad and fix it soon.
>

I understand that, the point is when to do stop the reclaim (do we
really need 32 pages to stop the reclaim, when we hit the limit,
something as low as a single page can help).  This is quite a subtle
thing, I'd mark it as low priority. I'll definitely come back if I see
unexpected behaviour.

Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
use it at all.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/swap.h |    3 +--
 mm/memcontrol.c      |    3 +--
 mm/vmscan.c          |    8 ++------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
 						unsigned int swappiness,
-						struct zone *zone,
-						int nid);
+						struct zone *zone);
 extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
 extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
 extern int vm_swappiness;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index aba4310..01f38ff 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
 		/* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
 		if (check_soft)
 			ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
-				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone,
-				zone->zone_pgdat->node_id);
+				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone);
 		else
 			ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
 						noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bd1d035..be860a0 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
 						unsigned int swappiness,
-						struct zone *zone, int nid)
+						struct zone *zone)
 {
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
@@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 		.order = 0,
 		.mem_cgroup = mem,
 	};
-	nodemask_t nm  = nodemask_of_node(nid);
-
 	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
 			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
-	sc.nodemask = &nm;
-	sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
-	sc.nr_scanned = 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
 	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:14:15 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
> thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
> use it at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:14:15PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
> thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
> use it at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h |    3 +--
>  mm/memcontrol.c      |    3 +--
>  mm/vmscan.c          |    8 ++------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
>  						unsigned int swappiness,
> -						struct zone *zone,
> -						int nid);
> +						struct zone *zone);
>  extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
>  extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
>  extern int vm_swappiness;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index aba4310..01f38ff 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
>  		/* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
>  		if (check_soft)
>  			ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> -				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone,
> -				zone->zone_pgdat->node_id);
> +				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone);
>  		else
>  			ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
>  						noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index bd1d035..be860a0 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
>  						unsigned int swappiness,
> -						struct zone *zone, int nid)
> +						struct zone *zone)
>  {
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> @@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  		.order = 0,
>  		.mem_cgroup = mem,
>  	};
> -	nodemask_t nm  = nodemask_of_node(nid);
> -
>  	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> -	sc.nodemask = &nm;
> -	sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> -	sc.nr_scanned = 0;
> +

Removing the initialisation of nr_reclaimed and nr_scanned is slightly
outside the scope of the patch but harmless.

I see no problem with the patch but it's also not related to tracepoints
so should be part of a separate series. Still, I didn't see any problem
with it.

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

>  	/*
>  	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
>  	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[Balbir Singh]

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:14:15]:

> Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
> thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
> use it at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h |    3 +--
>  mm/memcontrol.c      |    3 +--
>  mm/vmscan.c          |    8 ++------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
>  						unsigned int swappiness,
> -						struct zone *zone,
> -						int nid);
> +						struct zone *zone);
>  extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
>  extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
>  extern int vm_swappiness;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index aba4310..01f38ff 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
>  		/* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
>  		if (check_soft)
>  			ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> -				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone,
> -				zone->zone_pgdat->node_id);
> +				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone);
>  		else
>  			ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
>  						noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index bd1d035..be860a0 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
>  						unsigned int swappiness,
> -						struct zone *zone, int nid)
> +						struct zone *zone)
>  {
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> @@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  		.order = 0,
>  		.mem_cgroup = mem,
>  	};
> -	nodemask_t nm  = nodemask_of_node(nid);
> -
>  	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> -	sc.nodemask = &nm;
> -	sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> -	sc.nr_scanned = 0;

We need the initialization to 0, is there a reason why it was removed?
What happens when we compare or increment sc.nr_*?

Can we keep this indepedent of the tracing patches?

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
>  	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:14:15]:
> 
> > Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
> > thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
> > use it at all.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/swap.h |    3 +--
> >  mm/memcontrol.c      |    3 +--
> >  mm/vmscan.c          |    8 ++------
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >  extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> >  						unsigned int swappiness,
> > -						struct zone *zone,
> > -						int nid);
> > +						struct zone *zone);
> >  extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
> >  extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
> >  extern int vm_swappiness;
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index aba4310..01f38ff 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
> >  		/* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
> >  		if (check_soft)
> >  			ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> > -				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone,
> > -				zone->zone_pgdat->node_id);
> > +				noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone);
> >  		else
> >  			ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
> >  						noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index bd1d035..be860a0 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> >  unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >  						gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> >  						unsigned int swappiness,
> > -						struct zone *zone, int nid)
> > +						struct zone *zone)
> >  {
> >  	struct scan_control sc = {
> >  		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > @@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >  		.order = 0,
> >  		.mem_cgroup = mem,
> >  	};
> > -	nodemask_t nm  = nodemask_of_node(nid);
> > -
> >  	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
> >  			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> > -	sc.nodemask = &nm;
> > -	sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> > -	sc.nr_scanned = 0;
> 
> We need the initialization to 0, is there a reason why it was removed?

please reread C spec and other scan_control user.
sc_nr_* were already initialized in struct scan_control sc = { } line.



> What happens when we compare or increment sc.nr_*?
> 
> Can we keep this indepedent of the tracing patches?
> 
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
> >  	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> > -- 
> > 1.6.5.2
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> 
> -- 
> 	Three Cheers,
> 	Balbir



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask

[Balbir Singh]

>>
>> We need the initialization to 0, is there a reason why it was removed?
>
> please reread C spec and other scan_control user.
> sc_nr_* were already initialized in struct scan_control sc = { } line.
>

I missed the fact that  designated initializers do the right thing. Thanks!

Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim() has zone, nid and zid argument. but nid
and zid can be calculated from zone. So remove it.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    6 +++---
 include/linux/mmzone.h     |    5 +++++
 mm/memcontrol.c            |    5 ++---
 mm/vmscan.c                |    7 ++-----
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 9411d32..9dec218 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
 
 void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val);
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
-						int zid);
+					    gfp_t gfp_mask);
+
 #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
 struct mem_cgroup;
 
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page,
 
 static inline
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
-					    gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, int zid)
+					    gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 9ed9c45..34ac27a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -684,6 +684,11 @@ unsigned long __init node_memmap_size_bytes(int, unsigned long, unsigned long);
  */
 #define zone_idx(zone)		((zone) - (zone)->zone_pgdat->node_zones)
 
+static inline int zone_nid(struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+}
+
 static inline int populated_zone(struct zone *zone)
 {
 	return (!!zone->present_pages);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 01f38ff..81bc9bf 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2833,8 +2833,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 }
 
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
-						int zid)
+					    gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz, *next_mz = NULL;
@@ -2846,7 +2845,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
 	if (order > 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(nid, zid);
+	mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(zone_nid(zone), zone_idx(zone));
 	/*
 	 * This loop can run a while, specially if mem_cgroup's continuously
 	 * keep exceeding their soft limit and putting the system under
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index be860a0..89b4287 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2121,7 +2121,6 @@ loop_again:
 		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
 			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
 			int nr_slab;
-			int nid, zid;
 
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
 				continue;
@@ -2133,14 +2132,12 @@ loop_again:
 			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
 			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
 
-			nid = pgdat->node_id;
-			zid = zone_idx(zone);
 			/*
 			 * Call soft limit reclaim before calling shrink_zone.
 			 * For now we ignore the return value
 			 */
-			mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone, order, sc.gfp_mask,
-							nid, zid);
+			mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone, order, sc.gfp_mask);
+
 			/*
 			 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one
 			 * zone has way too many pages free already.
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:15:05 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim() has zone, nid and zid argument. but nid
> and zid can be calculated from zone. So remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:15:05PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim() has zone, nid and zid argument. but nid
> and zid can be calculated from zone. So remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h     |    5 +++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |    5 ++---
>  mm/vmscan.c                |    7 ++-----
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 9411d32..9dec218 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
>  
>  void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val);
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> -						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> -						int zid);
> +					    gfp_t gfp_mask);
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
>  struct mem_cgroup;
>  
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page,
>  
>  static inline
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> -					    gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, int zid)
> +					    gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 9ed9c45..34ac27a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -684,6 +684,11 @@ unsigned long __init node_memmap_size_bytes(int, unsigned long, unsigned long);
>   */
>  #define zone_idx(zone)		((zone) - (zone)->zone_pgdat->node_zones)
>  
> +static inline int zone_nid(struct zone *zone)
> +{
> +	return zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> +}
> +

hmm, adding a helper and not converting the existing users of
zone->zone_pgdat may be a little confusing particularly as both types of
usage would exist in the same file e.g. in mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages.

>  static inline int populated_zone(struct zone *zone)
>  {
>  	return (!!zone->present_pages);
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 01f38ff..81bc9bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2833,8 +2833,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  }
>  
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> -						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> -						int zid)
> +					    gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz, *next_mz = NULL;
> @@ -2846,7 +2845,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
>  	if (order > 0)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(nid, zid);
> +	mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(zone_nid(zone), zone_idx(zone));
>  	/*
>  	 * This loop can run a while, specially if mem_cgroup's continuously
>  	 * keep exceeding their soft limit and putting the system under
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index be860a0..89b4287 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2121,7 +2121,6 @@ loop_again:
>  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>  			int nr_slab;
> -			int nid, zid;
>  
>  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  				continue;
> @@ -2133,14 +2132,12 @@ loop_again:
>  			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
>  			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
>  
> -			nid = pgdat->node_id;
> -			zid = zone_idx(zone);
>  			/*
>  			 * Call soft limit reclaim before calling shrink_zone.
>  			 * For now we ignore the return value
>  			 */
> -			mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone, order, sc.gfp_mask,
> -							nid, zid);
> +			mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone, order, sc.gfp_mask);
> +

Other than the usual comment of it belonging in its own series

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

>  			/*
>  			 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one
>  			 * zone has way too many pages free already.
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> > +static inline int zone_nid(struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +	return zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> hmm, adding a helper and not converting the existing users of
> zone->zone_pgdat may be a little confusing particularly as both types of
> usage would exist in the same file e.g. in mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages.

I see. here is incrementa patch.

Thanks

From 62cf765251af257c98fc92a58215d101d200e7ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:30:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: convert to zone_nid() from bare zone->zone_pgdat->node_id

Now, we have zone_nid(). this patch convert all existing users of
zone->zone_pgdat.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 82e191f..3d5b645 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				       struct zone *zone,
 				       enum lru_list lru)
 {
-	int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+	int nid = zone_nid(zone);
 	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
 
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 						      struct zone *zone)
 {
-	int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+	int nid = zone_nid(zone);
 	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
 
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	LIST_HEAD(pc_list);
 	struct list_head *src;
 	struct page_cgroup *pc, *tmp;
-	int nid = z->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+	int nid = zone_nid(z);
 	int zid = zone_idx(z);
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 	int lru = LRU_FILE * file + active;
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[Balbir Singh]

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-21 22:33:56]:

> > > +static inline int zone_nid(struct zone *zone)
> > > +{
> > > +	return zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > hmm, adding a helper and not converting the existing users of
> > zone->zone_pgdat may be a little confusing particularly as both types of
> > usage would exist in the same file e.g. in mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages.
> 
> I see. here is incrementa patch.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> From 62cf765251af257c98fc92a58215d101d200e7ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:30:14 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: convert to zone_nid() from bare zone->zone_pgdat->node_id
> 
> Now, we have zone_nid(). this patch convert all existing users of
> zone->zone_pgdat.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 82e191f..3d5b645 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  				       struct zone *zone,
>  				       enum lru_list lru)
>  {
> -	int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> +	int nid = zone_nid(zone);
>  	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
>  
> @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  						      struct zone *zone)
>  {
> -	int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> +	int nid = zone_nid(zone);
>  	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
>  
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	LIST_HEAD(pc_list);
>  	struct list_head *src;
>  	struct page_cgroup *pc, *tmp;
> -	int nid = z->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> +	int nid = zone_nid(z);
>  	int zid = zone_idx(z);
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
>  	int lru = LRU_FILE * file + active;

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 
-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33:56PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > +static inline int zone_nid(struct zone *zone)
> > > +{
> > > +	return zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > hmm, adding a helper and not converting the existing users of
> > zone->zone_pgdat may be a little confusing particularly as both types of
> > usage would exist in the same file e.g. in mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages.
> 
> I see. here is incrementa patch.
> 

Looks grand. Thanks

> From 62cf765251af257c98fc92a58215d101d200e7ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:30:14 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: convert to zone_nid() from bare zone->zone_pgdat->node_id
> 
> Now, we have zone_nid(). this patch convert all existing users of
> zone->zone_pgdat.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> <SNIP>

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 4/7] vmscan: convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

TRACE_EVENT() is a bit old fashion. convert it.

no functionally change.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index b26daa9..bd749c1 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd,
 		__entry->order)
 );
 
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template,
 
 	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
 
@@ -92,7 +92,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
 		show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags))
 );
 
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
+
+	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+
+	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
+);
+
+
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template,
 
 	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
 
@@ -109,6 +117,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
 	TP_printk("nr_reclaimed=%lu", __entry->nr_reclaimed)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
+
+	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
 
 	TP_PROTO(int order,
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/7] vmscan: convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:16:05 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> TRACE_EVENT() is a bit old fashion. convert it.
> 
> no functionally change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/7] vmscan: convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:16:05PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> TRACE_EVENT() is a bit old fashion. convert it.
> 

heh, it's not a question of fashion :). It was defined this way because
there wasn't a second user that would use the template. I didn't see the
advantage of creating a template for one user. Your series adds a second
one so it makes sense to convert.

> no functionally change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> index b26daa9..bd749c1 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd,
>  		__entry->order)
>  );
>  
> -TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template,
>  
>  	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
>  
> @@ -92,7 +92,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
>  		show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags))
>  );
>  
> -TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
> +);

Over 80 columns there.

> +
> +
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template,
>  
>  	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
>  
> @@ -109,6 +117,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
>  	TP_printk("nr_reclaimed=%lu", __entry->nr_reclaimed)
>  );
>  
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
> +);
> +

Over 80 columns here too.

I know I broke it multiple times in my last series because I thought it
wasn't enforced any more but I got called on it.


>  TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>  
>  	TP_PROTO(int order,

Otherwise, I can't spot a problem.

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/7] vmscan: convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:08 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>  
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end,
> > +
> > +	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
> > +
> > +	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
> > +);
> > +
> 
> Over 80 columns here too.
> 
> I know I broke it multiple times in my last series because I thought it
> wasn't enforced any more but I got called on it.

Note, The TRACE_EVENT() macros have a bit more leniency to the 80 column
rule.

-- Steve
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 5/7] memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Memcg also need to trace reclaim progress as direct reclaim. This patch
add it.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/vmscan.c                   |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index bd749c1..cc19cb0 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -99,6 +99,19 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_b
 	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin,
+
+	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+
+	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin,
+
+	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+
+	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
+);
 
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template,
 
@@ -124,6 +137,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
 	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
+
+	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
+
+	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
+);
+
+
 TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
 
 	TP_PROTO(int order,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 89b4287..21eb94f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
 			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
 
+	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin(0,
+						      sc.may_writepage,
+						      sc.gfp_mask);
+
 	/*
 	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
 	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
@@ -1951,6 +1955,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 	 * the priority and make it zero.
 	 */
 	shrink_zone(0, zone, &sc);
+
+	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
+
 	return sc.nr_reclaimed;
 }
 
@@ -1960,6 +1967,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
 					   unsigned int swappiness)
 {
 	struct zonelist *zonelist;
+	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
@@ -1974,7 +1982,16 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
 	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
 			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
 	zonelist = NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists;
-	return do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
+
+	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0,
+					    sc.may_writepage,
+					    sc.gfp_mask);
+
+	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
+
+	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed);
+
+	return nr_reclaimed;
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 5/7] memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:16:46 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> Memcg also need to trace reclaim progress as direct reclaim. This patch
> add it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Thank you!!

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 5/7] memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:16:46PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> Memcg also need to trace reclaim progress as direct reclaim. This patch
> add it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> index bd749c1..cc19cb0 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,19 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_b
>  	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
>  );
>  
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(int order, int may_writepage, gfp_t gfp_flags),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(order, may_writepage, gfp_flags)
> +);
>  
>  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template,
>  
> @@ -124,6 +137,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
>  	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
>  );
>  
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed)
> +);
> +
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>  
>  	TP_PROTO(int order,
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 89b4287..21eb94f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1943,6 +1943,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
>  
> +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin(0,
> +						      sc.may_writepage,
> +						      sc.gfp_mask);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
>  	 * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> @@ -1951,6 +1955,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  	 * the priority and make it zero.
>  	 */
>  	shrink_zone(0, zone, &sc);
> +
> +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
> +
>  	return sc.nr_reclaimed;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1960,6 +1967,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
>  					   unsigned int swappiness)
>  {
>  	struct zonelist *zonelist;
> +	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
> @@ -1974,7 +1982,16 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
>  	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
>  	zonelist = NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists;
> -	return do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
> +
> +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0,
> +					    sc.may_writepage,
> +					    sc.gfp_mask);
> +
> +	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
> +
> +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed);
> +
> +	return nr_reclaimed;
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 5/7] memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint

[Balbir Singh]

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:16:46]:

> 
> Memcg also need to trace reclaim progress as direct reclaim. This patch
> add it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Looks good to me


Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 6/7] vmscan: convert mm_vmscan_lru_isolate to DEFINE_EVENT

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

TRACE_EVENT() is a bit old fashion and we need to use
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS for introducing memcg isolate pages
tracepoint.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index cc19cb0..e37fe72 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_re
 );
 
 
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
 
 	TP_PROTO(int order,
 		unsigned long nr_requested,
@@ -198,6 +198,21 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
 		__entry->nr_lumpy_failed)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
+
+	TP_PROTO(int order,
+		unsigned long nr_requested,
+		unsigned long nr_scanned,
+		unsigned long nr_taken,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
+		int isolate_mode),
+
+	TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
+
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
 
 	TP_PROTO(struct page *page,
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 6/7] vmscan: convert mm_vmscan_lru_isolate to DEFINE_EVENT

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:17:36 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> TRACE_EVENT() is a bit old fashion and we need to use
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS for introducing memcg isolate pages
> tracepoint.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 7/7] memcg: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Memcg also need to trace page isolation information as global reclaim.
This patch does it.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
 mm/memcontrol.c               |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index e37fe72..eefd399 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
 
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
+
+	TP_PROTO(int order,
+		unsigned long nr_requested,
+		unsigned long nr_scanned,
+		unsigned long nr_taken,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
+		unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
+		int isolate_mode),
+
+	TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
+
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
 
 	TP_PROTO(struct page *page,
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 81bc9bf..82e191f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
+#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
+
+
 struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
 #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES	5
 struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
@@ -1042,6 +1045,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	}
 
 	*scanned = scan;
+
+	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate(0, nr_to_scan, scan, nr_taken,
+				      0, 0, 0, mode);
+
 	return nr_taken;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:18:18 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> Memcg also need to trace page isolation information as global reclaim.
> This patch does it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:18:18PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> Memcg also need to trace page isolation information as global reclaim.
> This patch does it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c               |    7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> index e37fe72..eefd399 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>  
>  );
>  
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(int order,
> +		unsigned long nr_requested,

I just spotted that this is badly named by myself. It should have been
order.

> +		unsigned long nr_scanned,
> +		unsigned long nr_taken,
> +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
> +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
> +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
> +		int isolate_mode),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
> +
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
>  
>  	TP_PROTO(struct page *page,
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 81bc9bf..82e191f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> +#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
> +
> +

Excessive whitespace there.

Otherwise, I didn't spot any problems.

>  struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
>  #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES	5
>  struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
> @@ -1042,6 +1045,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	}
>  
>  	*scanned = scan;
> +
> +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate(0, nr_to_scan, scan, nr_taken,
> +				      0, 0, 0, mode);
> +
>  	return nr_taken;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:21:09PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:18:18PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > 
> > Memcg also need to trace page isolation information as global reclaim.
> > This patch does it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
> >  mm/memcontrol.c               |    7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> > index e37fe72..eefd399 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> > @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
> >  
> >  );
> >  
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
> > +
> > +	TP_PROTO(int order,
> > +		unsigned long nr_requested,
> 
> I just spotted that this is badly named by myself. It should have been
> order.
> 

I meant it should have been nr_to_scan (not order) because it's easier to
translate between what is happening in the source when reading the tracepoints.

> > +		unsigned long nr_scanned,
> > +		unsigned long nr_taken,
> > +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
> > +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
> > +		unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
> > +		int isolate_mode),
> > +
> > +	TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
> > +
> > +);
> > +
> >  TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
> >  
> >  	TP_PROTO(struct page *page,
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 81bc9bf..82e191f 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
> >  
> >  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >  
> > +#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
> > +
> > +
> 
> Excessive whitespace there.
> 
> Otherwise, I didn't spot any problems.
> 
> >  struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
> >  #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES	5
> >  struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
> > @@ -1042,6 +1045,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	*scanned = scan;
> > +
> > +	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate(0, nr_to_scan, scan, nr_taken,
> > +				      0, 0, 0, mode);
> > +
> >  	return nr_taken;
> >  }

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg reclaim tracepoint

[Daisuke Nishimura]

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:12:46 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Recently, Mel Gorman added some vmscan tracepoint. but they can't
> trace memcg. So, This patch series does.
> 
> 
> following three patches are nit fix and cleanups.
> 
>   memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized
>   memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask
>   memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone
> 
I'm not so familiar with tracepoints, but I don't have any objection to these
3 fix/cleanup for memcg.

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura

> following four patches are tracepoint conversion and adding memcg tracepoints.
> 
>   vmscan:        convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT
>   memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint
>   vmscan:        convert mm_vmscan_lru_isolate to DEFINE_EVENT
>   memcg, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint
> 
> 
> diffstat
> ================
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h    |    6 ++--
>  include/linux/mmzone.h        |    5 +++
>  include/linux/swap.h          |    3 +-
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c               |   15 +++++---
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |   35 ++++++++++++------
>  6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Sameple output is here.
> =========================
> 
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837763: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837783: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837860: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
>   (...)
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608235: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=0 zid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608239: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=1 zid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608248: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=2 zid=1 order=0
>          kswapd1-348   [001]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=3 zid=1 order=0
>          kswapd3-350   [000]   266.608266: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=3 order=0
>   (...)
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328891: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328897: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328915: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328989: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.329019: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.330562: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>   (...)
>          kswapd2-349   [001]   267.407081: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=2
>          kswapd3-350   [001]   267.408077: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=3
>          kswapd1-348   [000]   267.427858: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=1
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.430064: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg reclaim tracepoint

[Balbir Singh]

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:12:46]:

> Recently, Mel Gorman added some vmscan tracepoint. but they can't
> trace memcg. So, This patch series does.
> 
> 
> following three patches are nit fix and cleanups.
> 
>   memcg: sc.nr_to_reclaim should be initialized
>   memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask
>   memcg: nid and zid can be calculated from zone
> 
> following four patches are tracepoint conversion and adding memcg tracepoints.
> 
>   vmscan:        convert direct reclaim tracepoint to DEFINE_EVENT
>   memcg, vmscan: add memcg reclaim tracepoint
>   vmscan:        convert mm_vmscan_lru_isolate to DEFINE_EVENT
>   memcg, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint
> 
> 
> diffstat
> ================
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h    |    6 ++--
>  include/linux/mmzone.h        |    5 +++
>  include/linux/swap.h          |    3 +-
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c               |   15 +++++---
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |   35 ++++++++++++------
>  6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Sameple output is here.
> =========================
> 
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837763: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837783: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>               dd-1851  [001]   158.837860: mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
>   (...)
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608235: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=0 zid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608239: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=1 zid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608248: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=2 zid=1 order=0
>          kswapd1-348   [001]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=1 order=0
>               dd-1970  [000]   266.608254: mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd: nid=3 zid=1 order=0
>          kswapd3-350   [000]   266.608266: mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake: nid=3 order=0
>   (...)
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328891: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin: order=0 may_writepage=1 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328897: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328915: mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate: isolate_mode=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.328989: mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=32
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.329019: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.330562: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32 nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>   (...)
>          kswapd2-349   [001]   267.407081: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=2
>          kswapd3-350   [001]   267.408077: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=3
>          kswapd1-348   [000]   267.427858: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=1
>          kswapd0-347   [001]   267.430064: mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep: nid=0
>

This looks interesting, but I think I need to look deeper to see how
the name like mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin is generated. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>