linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: VFS scalability git tree
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:21:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100724002101.GL32635@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723155118.GB5773@amd>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 01:51:18AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:13:10PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:01:00AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > I'm pleased to announce I have a git tree up of my vfs scalability work.
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git
> > > 
> > > Branch vfs-scale-working
> > 
> > I've got a couple of patches needed to build XFS - they shrinker
> > merge left some bad fragments - I'll post them in a minute. This
> 
> OK cool.
> 
> 
> > email is for the longest ever lockdep warning I've seen that
> > occurred on boot.
> 
> Ah thanks. OK that was one of my attempts to keep sockets out of
> hidding the vfs as much as possible (lazy inode number evaluation).
> Not a big problem, but I'll drop the patch for now.
> 
> I have just got one for you too, btw :) (on vanilla kernel but it is
> messing up my lockdep stress testing on xfs). Real or false?
> 
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.35-rc5-00064-ga9f7f2e #334
> -------------------------------------------------------
> kswapd0/605 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++--}, at: [<ffffffff8125500c>]
> xfs_ilock+0x7c/0xa0
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&xfs_mount_list_lock){++++.-}, at: [<ffffffff81281a76>]
> xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink+0xc6/0x140

False positive, but the xfs_mount_list_lock is gone in 2.6.35-rc6 -
the shrinker context change has fixed that - so you can ignore it
anyway.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-24  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-22 19:01 VFS scalability git tree Nick Piggin
2010-07-23 11:13 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 14:04   ` [PATCH 0/2] vfs scalability tree fixes Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 16:09     ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-23 14:04   ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix shrinker build Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 14:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: shrinker should use a per-filesystem scan count Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 15:51   ` VFS scalability git tree Nick Piggin
2010-07-24  0:21     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-07-23 11:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 15:42   ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-23 13:55 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 16:16   ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-27  7:05   ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-27 11:09     ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-27 13:18     ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-27 15:09       ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-28  4:59         ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-23 15:35 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-24  8:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-24  8:44   ` [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: shrink_all_slab() use reclaim_state instead the return value of shrink_slab() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-24 12:05     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-24  8:46   ` [PATCH 2/2] vmscan: change shrink_slab() return tyep with void KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-24 10:54   ` VFS scalability git tree KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-26  5:41 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-28 10:24   ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-30  9:12 ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-03  0:27   ` john stultz
2010-08-03  5:44     ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100724002101.GL32635@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).