From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] writeback: explicit low bound for vm.dirty_ratio
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:34:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100805163401.e9754032.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100805162433.673243074@intel.com>
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:10:58 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> Force a user visible low bound of 5% for the vm.dirty_ratio interface.
>
> Currently global_dirty_limits() applies a low bound of 5% for
> vm_dirty_ratio. This is not very user visible -- if the user sets
> vm.dirty_ratio=1, the operation seems to succeed but will be rounded up
> to 5% when used.
>
> Another problem is inconsistency: calc_period_shift() uses the plain
> vm_dirty_ratio value, which may be a problem when vm.dirty_ratio is set
> to < 5 by the user.
The changelog describes the old behaviour but doesn't describe the
proposed new behaviour.
> --- linux-next.orig/kernel/sysctl.c 2010-08-05 22:48:34.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/kernel/sysctl.c 2010-08-05 22:48:47.000000000 +0800
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int ten_thousand = 10000;
>
> /* this is needed for the proc_doulongvec_minmax of vm_dirty_bytes */
> static unsigned long dirty_bytes_min = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> +static int dirty_ratio_min = 5;
>
> /* this is needed for the proc_dointvec_minmax for [fs_]overflow UID and GID */
> static int maxolduid = 65535;
> @@ -1031,7 +1032,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .maxlen = sizeof(vm_dirty_ratio),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = dirty_ratio_handler,
> - .extra1 = &zero,
> + .extra1 = &dirty_ratio_min,
> .extra2 = &one_hundred,
> },
I forget how the procfs core handles this. Presumably the write will
now fail with -EINVAL or something? So people's scripts will now
error out and their space shuttles will crash?
All of which illustrates why it's important to fully describe changes
in the changelog! So people can consider and discuss the end-user
implications of a change.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-05 16:10 [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36 Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] writeback: reduce calls to global_page_state in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds Wu Fengguang
2010-08-06 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] writeback: add comment to the dirty limits functions Wu Fengguang
2010-08-06 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-07 16:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 04/13] writeback: dont redirty tail an inode with dirty pages Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate cases Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] writeback: explicit low bound for vm.dirty_ratio Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 23:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-06 12:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-10 3:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-10 3:57 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-10 13:29 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-10 18:12 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-10 18:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] writeback: pass writeback_control down to move_expired_inodes() Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/13] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/13] writeback: kill writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/13] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 12/13] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 17:00 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-05 22:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 22:50 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 13/13] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_written Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 23:08 ` [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100805163401.e9754032.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).