From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
npiggin@suse.de, david@fromorbit.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:28:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812222857.GC3665@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812183547.GA2294@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2400 bytes --]
On Thu 12-08-10 14:35:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I have an oops with current Linus' tree in xfstests 217 that looks
> like it was caused by this patch:
Thanks for report!
> 217 149s ...[ 5105.342605] XFS mounting filesystem vdb6
> [ 5105.373481] Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: vdb6
> [ 5115.405061] XFS mounting filesystem loop0
> [ 5115.548654] Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: loop0
> [ 5115.588067] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at f7f14000
> [ 5115.588067] IP: [<c07224fd>] radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged+0x15d/0x1c0
> [ 5115.588067] *pde = 00007067 *pte = 00000000
> [ 5115.588067] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 5115.588067] last sysfs file:
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/loop0/removable
We seem to oops at:
while (((index >> shift) & RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) == 0) {
/*
* We've fully scanned this node. Go up. Because
* last_index is guaranteed to be in the tree, what
* we do below cannot wander astray.
*/
>>>>> slot = open_slots[height];
height++;
shift += RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
}
> Entering kdb (current=0xf7868100, pid 15675) on processor 0 Oops: (null) due to oops @ 0xc07224fd
> <d>Modules linked in:
> <c>
> <d>Pid: 15675, comm: mkfs.xfs Not tainted 2.6.35+ #305 /Bochs
> <d>EIP: 0060:[<c07224fd>] EFLAGS: 00010002 CPU: 0
> EIP is at radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged+0x15d/0x1c0
> <d>EAX: f7f14000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 482bb4f8 EDX: 0c0748d4
> <d>ESI: 2031756d EDI: 00000000 EBP: c7d41d10 ESP: c7d41cb0
And from the values in registers the loop seems to have went astray
because "index" was zero at the point we entered the loop... looking
around... Ah, I see, you create files with 16TB size which creates
radix tree of such height that radix_tree_maxindex(height) == ~0UL and
if write_cache_pages() passes in ~0UL as end, we can overflow the index.
Hmm, I haven't realized that is possible.
OK, attached is a patch that should fix the issue. There is just still an
issue that *first_indexp will overflow in this case as well and thus we
could in theory loop indefinitely. I'll have to think how to best handle
this overflow - checking in caller is kind of prone to errors...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-mm-Fix-overflow-in-radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 18:47 [PATCH 0/2 RFC v3] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writeback Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] radix-tree: Implement function radix_tree_gang_tag_if_tagged Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-05 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-07 16:09 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-08 5:29 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-09 13:04 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-10 8:12 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-12 18:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-12 22:28 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-08-13 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-05 1:14 ` [PATCH 0/2 RFC v3] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writeback Nick Piggin
2010-06-06 4:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-06 7:52 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-24 13:57 [PATCH 0/2 v5] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writes Jan Kara
2010-06-24 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-16 16:33 Jan Kara
2010-06-16 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-18 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-21 12:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:40 [PATCH 0/2 RFC v3] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writeback Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-09 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 12:42 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100812222857.GC3665@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).