linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Over-eager swapping
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:43:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100819151351.GA23611@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819092536.GH2370@arachsys.com>

* Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> [2010-08-19 10:25:36]:

> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > Can you give an idea of what the meminfo inside the guest looks like.
> 
> Sorry for the slow reply here. Unfortunately not, as these guests are run on
> behalf of customers. They install them with operating systems of their
> choice, and run them on our service.
>

Thanks for clarifying.
 
> > Have you looked at
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/8/4580772
> 
> Yes, I've been watching this discussions with interest. Our application is
> one where we have little to no control over what goes on inside the guests,
> but these sorts of things definitely make sense where the two are under the
> same administrative control.
>

Not necessarily, in some cases you can use a guest that uses lesser
page cache, but that might not matter in your case at the moment.
 
> > Do we have reason to believe the problem can be solved entirely in the
> > host?
> 
> It's not clear to me why this should be difficult, given that the total size
> of vm allocated to guests (and system processes) is always strictly less
> than the total amount of RAM available in the host. I do understand that it
> won't allow for as impressive overcommit (except by ksm) or be as efficient,
> because file-backed guest pages won't get evicted by pressure in the host as
> they are indistinguishable from anonymous pages.
>
> After all, a solution that isn't ideal, but does work, is to turn off swap
> completely! This is what we've been doing to date. The only problem with
> this is that we can't dip into swap in an emergency if there's no swap there
> at all.

If you are not overcommitting it should work, in my experiments I've
seen a lot of memory used by the host as page cache on behalf of the
guest. I've done my experiments using cgroups to identify accurate
usage.

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-19 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-02 12:47 Over-eager swapping Chris Webb
2010-08-02 23:55 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-03  3:31   ` Chris Webb
2010-08-03  4:09     ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-03  4:28       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-03  4:47         ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-03  6:39           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-03 21:49         ` Chris Webb
2010-08-04  2:21           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-04  3:10             ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-04  3:24               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-04  9:58                 ` Chris Webb
2010-08-04 11:49                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-04 12:04                     ` Chris Webb
2010-08-18 14:38                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-18 14:46                         ` Chris Webb
2010-08-18 15:21                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-18 15:57                             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-18 16:20                               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-18 15:57                             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-08-18 15:58                               ` Chris Webb
2010-08-18 16:13                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-18 16:32                                   ` Chris Webb
2010-08-19  5:16                                   ` Balbir Singh
2010-08-19 10:20                                   ` Chris Webb
2010-08-19 19:03                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-18 16:13                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-18 16:31                                   ` Chris Webb
2010-08-19  5:13         ` Balbir Singh
2010-08-18 16:45 ` Balbir Singh
2010-08-19  9:25   ` Chris Webb
2010-08-19 15:13     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-23  9:27 Richard Davies
2012-04-23 12:07 ` Zdenek Kaspar
2012-04-23 17:19 ` Dave Hansen
2012-04-24  0:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 11:16 ` Peter Lieven
2012-04-25 14:41 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100819151351.GA23611@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris@arachsys.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).