From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Iram Shahzad <iram.shahzad@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: compaction: trying to understand the code
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823071610.GL19797@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100822153121.GA29389@barrios-desktop>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:31:21AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> <SNIP>
>
> From 560e8898295c663f02aede07b3d55880eba16c69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:20:44 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly in too_many_isolated
>
> Iram reported compaction's too_many_isolated loops forever.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg08123.html)
>
> The meminfo of situation happened was inactive anon is zero.
> That's because the system has no memory pressure until then.
> While all anon pages was in active lru, compaction could select
> active lru as well as inactive lru. That's different things
> with vmscan's isolated. So we has been two too_many_isolated.
>
> While compaction can isolated pages in both active and inactive,
> current implementation of too_many_isolated only considers inactive.
> It made Iram's problem.
>
> This patch handles active and inactie with fair.
> That's because we can't expect where from and how many compaction would
> isolated pages.
>
> This patch changes (nr_isolated > nr_inactive) with
> nr_isolated > (nr_active + nr_inactive) / 2.
>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Seems reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Want to repost this as a standalone patch?
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 94cce51..0864839 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -214,15 +214,16 @@ static void acct_isolated(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
> /* Similar to reclaim, but different enough that they don't share logic */
> static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
> {
> -
> - unsigned long inactive, isolated;
> + unsigned long active, inactive, isolated;
>
> inactive = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
> zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + active = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> + zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON);
> isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) +
> zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> -
> - return isolated > inactive;
> +
> + return isolated > (inactive + active) / 2;
> }
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 11:08 compaction: trying to understand the code Iram Shahzad
2010-08-17 11:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-18 8:19 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-18 15:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-19 7:09 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-19 7:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-19 7:46 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-19 8:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-19 8:15 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-19 8:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 5:45 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-20 5:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 6:13 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-19 16:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-20 5:31 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-20 5:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 9:35 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-20 10:22 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-22 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-22 23:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23 1:58 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-23 3:03 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-23 9:10 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 8:51 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-23 7:18 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-23 17:14 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-24 0:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-24 5:07 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-24 6:52 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 8:05 ` Iram Shahzad
2010-08-23 7:16 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-08-23 9:07 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-20 10:23 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100823071610.GL19797@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=iram.shahzad@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).