linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix hang on anon_vma->root->lock
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:19:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100827001926.GA6803@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik8cHD_qsey8NBw-YWsoibwMM5RNP9SeKom2VtC@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:54:28AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:41 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >> After several hours, kbuild tests hang with anon_vma_prepare() spinning on
> >> a newly allocated anon_vma's lock - on a box with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> >> (which makes this very much more likely, but it could happen without).
> >>
> >> The ever-subtle page_lock_anon_vma() now needs a further twist: since
> >> anon_vma_prepare() and anon_vma_fork() are liable to change the ->root
> >> of a reused anon_vma structure at any moment, page_lock_anon_vma()
> >> needs to check page_mapped() again before succeeding, otherwise
> >> page_unlock_anon_vma() might address a different root->lock.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> >
> > Interesting, is the condition which allows this to trigger specific
> > to this merge window or was it always possible?
> 
> Just specific to this merge window, which started using
> anon_vma->root->lock in place of anon_vma->lock (anon_vma->root is
> often anon_vma itself, but not always).  I _think_ that change was
> itself a simplification of the locking in 2.6.35, rather than plugging
> a particular hole (it's not been backported to -stable), but I may be
> wrong on that - Rik?

rmap_walk_anon isn't stable without the anon_vma->root->lock. This is
because it only locks the local anon_vma and but the "vma" can be
still modified under it in vma_adjust, so vma_address can fail and
migration will crash. swapping is not issue as it's ok to miss a pte
once in a while if the vma is under vma_adjust by the time the VM
tries to unmap the page.

See the anon_vma_lock added as well to vma_adjust (without it, it'd be
just an useless exercise, but instead it's really plugging a real hole
thanks to the anon_vma_lock addition to vma_adjust).

Again not an issue unless you use migration (incidentally what memory
compaction uses, and you know who the primary user of memory
compaction is :).

Secondly ksm_does_need_to_copy can't be fixed to cow only pages that
are nonlinear as the page->mapping != anon_vma can now generate false
positives. It's now trivial to fix with page->mapping->root !=
anon_vma->root.

About your patch, it's a noop in my view... A single page_mapping
check after rcu_read_lock is enough. And "anon_vma->root" can't change
if page->mapping points to "anon_vma" at any time after rcu_read_lock
returns. rcu_read_lock works for all anon_vma including
anon_vma->root.

If you were running the page_mapped() check on a different "page" then
it could make a difference, but repeating it on the same page in the
same rcu_read_lock protected critical section won't make a difference
as far as the anon_vma freeing is concerned.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-27  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-26  6:12 [PATCH] mm: fix hang on anon_vma->root->lock Hugh Dickins
2010-08-26  6:41 ` David Miller
2010-08-26 10:54   ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-26 19:00     ` David Miller
2010-08-27  0:19     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2010-08-26 13:32 ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-26 23:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-08-27  1:43   ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27  9:55     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-08-27 16:43       ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27 17:13         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-27 17:55           ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27 19:29             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-27 20:14               ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27 20:56                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-27 21:28                   ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27 21:33                     ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-27 23:06                       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-28  1:07                         ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-28  2:47                           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-28 10:17                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 15:54                           ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100827001926.GA6803@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).