linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:36:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831143649.GA31730@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100831141942.GA30353@localhost>

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:19:42PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:22:46PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 22-08-10 08:42:32, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > 
> > > It helps to explain in changelog/code
> > > 
> > > - in what situation a ZONE_MOVABLE will contain !MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> > >   pages? 
> > 
> > page can be MIGRATE_RESERVE IIUC.
> 
> Yup, it may also be set to MIGRATE_ISOLATE by soft_offline_page().

Ah a non-movable page allocation could fall back into the movable
zone. See __rmqueue_fallback() and the fallbacks[][] array. So the

        if (type != MIGRATE_MOVABLE && !pageblock_free(page))

check in is_mem_section_removable() is correct. It is
set_migratetype_isolate() that should be fixed to use the same check.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-31 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-20 14:14 [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-08-22  0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23  9:22   ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30     ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 14:19     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-08-31 14:59         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-01  1:19         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 12:19       ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:41         ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02  5:45           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02  8:28             ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02  9:03               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02  9:24                 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 11:19                   ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 13:18                     ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:19                       ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:39                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05                           ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03  3:10                             ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03  3:11                               ` [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] fix next active pageblock calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03  3:14                               ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03  8:25                                 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03  9:13                                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03  9:50                                     ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 10:05                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 11:01                                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42                                         ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code v3 Michal Hocko
2010-09-04  2:55                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-06  9:16                                             ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03  9:15                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-09-03  9:24                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03  7:54                               ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Michal Hocko
2010-09-03  7:57                               ` [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 20:48                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:05                                   ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100831143649.GA31730@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).