From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:59:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903205945.44e1aa38.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100904032311.GA14222@localhost>
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:23:11 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > Still, given the improvements in performance from this patchset,
> > I'd say inclusion is a no-braniner....
>
> In your case it's not really high memory pressure, but maybe too many
> concurrent direct reclaimers, so that when one reclaimed some free
> pages, others kick in and "steal" the free pages. So we need to kill
> the second cond_resched() call (which effectively gives other tasks a
> good chance to steal this task's vmscan fruits), and only do
> drain_all_pages() when nothing was reclaimed (instead of allocated).
Well... cond_resched() will only resched when this task has been
marked for preemption. If that's happening at such a high frequency
then Something Is Up with the scheduler, and the reported context
switch rate will be high.
> Dave, will you give a try of this patch? It's based on Mel's.
>
>
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2010-09-04 11:08:03.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page_alloc.c 2010-09-04 11:16:33.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1850,6 +1850,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_m
>
> cond_resched();
>
> +retry:
> /* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
> cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
> p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> @@ -1863,26 +1864,23 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_m
> lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>
> - cond_resched();
> -
> - if (unlikely(!(*did_some_progress)))
> + if (unlikely(!(*did_some_progress))) {
> + if (!drained) {
> + drain_all_pages();
> + drained = true;
> + goto retry;
> + }
> return NULL;
> + }
>
> -retry:
> page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, nodemask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> alloc_flags, preferred_zone,
> migratetype);
>
> - /*
> - * If an allocation failed after direct reclaim, it could be because
> - * pages are pinned on the per-cpu lists. Drain them and try again
> - */
> - if (!page && !drained) {
> - drain_all_pages();
> - drained = true;
> + /* someone steal our vmscan fruits? */
> + if (!page && *did_some_progress)
> goto retry;
> - }
Perhaps the fruit-stealing event is worth adding to the
userspace-exposed vm stats somewhere. But not in /proc - somewhere
more temporary, in debugfs.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-04 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-03 9:08 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V4 Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: page allocator: Update free page counters after pages are placed on the free list Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-05 18:06 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: page allocator: Calculate a better estimate of NR_FREE_PAGES when memory is low and kswapd is awake Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 23:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-03 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04 0:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-05 18:12 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04 2:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04 7:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04 8:14 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <20100905015400.GA10714@localhost>
[not found] ` <20100905021555.GG705@dastard>
[not found] ` <20100905060539.GA17450@localhost>
[not found] ` <20100905131447.GJ705@dastard>
2010-09-05 13:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-05 23:33 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06 4:02 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06 8:40 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08 8:49 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-09 12:39 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-10 6:17 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-07 14:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08 2:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04 3:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04 3:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-09-04 4:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-05 18:22 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:14 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08 7:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-08 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 12:41 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 15:05 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-10 2:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-03 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V4 Andrew Morton
2010-09-21 11:17 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 12:58 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-09-21 14:23 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-23 18:49 ` Greg KH
2010-09-24 9:14 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-31 17:37 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V3 Mel Gorman
2010-08-31 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-31 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-23 8:00 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V2 Mel Gorman
2010-08-23 8:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-23 23:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-16 9:42 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator Mel Gorman
2010-08-16 9:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-16 14:50 ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-17 2:57 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-18 3:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-19 14:47 ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-19 15:10 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100903205945.44e1aa38.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).