From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: Do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:18:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100916151827.GA11405@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100916141147.GC16115@barrios-desktop>
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > struct scan_control *sc)
> > > > {
> > > > + enum bdi_queue_status ret = QUEUEWRITE_DENIED;
> > > > +
> > > > if (current->flags & PF_SWAPWRITE)
> > > > - return 1;
> > > > + return QUEUEWRITE_ALLOWED;
> > > > if (!bdi_write_congested(bdi))
> > > > - return 1;
> > > > + return QUEUEWRITE_ALLOWED;
> > > > + else
> > > > + ret = QUEUEWRITE_CONGESTED;
> > > > if (bdi == current->backing_dev_info)
> > > > - return 1;
> > > > + return QUEUEWRITE_ALLOWED;
> > > >
> > > > /* lumpy reclaim for hugepage often need a lot of write */
> > > > if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> > > > - return 1;
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + return QUEUEWRITE_ALLOWED;
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > The function can't return QUEUEXXX_DENIED.
> > > It can affect disable_lumpy_reclaim.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, but that change was made in "vmscan: Narrow the scenarios lumpy
> > reclaim uses synchrounous reclaim". Maybe I am misunderstanding your
> > objection.
>
> I means current may_write_to_queue never returns QUEUEWRITE_DENIED.
> What's the role of it?
>
As of now, little point because QUEUEWRITE_CONGESTED implies denied. I was allowing
the possibility of distinguishing between these cases in the future depending
on what happened with wait_iff_congested(). I will drop it for simplicity
and reintroduce it when or if there is a distinction between
denied and congested.
> In addition, we don't need disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode() in pageout.
> That's because both PAGE_KEEP and PAGE_KEEP_CONGESTED go to keep_locked
> and calls disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode at last.
>
True, good spot.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-15 12:27 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce latencies and improve overall reclaim efficiency v2 Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/8] tracing, vmscan: Add trace events for LRU list shrinking Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/8] writeback: Account for time spent congestion_waited Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/8] vmscan: Synchronous lumpy reclaim should not call congestion_wait() Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 4/8] vmscan: Narrow the scenarios lumpy reclaim uses synchrounous reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 5/8] vmscan: Remove dead code in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 6/8] vmscan: isolated_lru_pages() stop neighbour search if neighbour cannot be isolated Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 7/8] writeback: Do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs Mel Gorman
2010-09-16 7:59 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-16 8:23 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 8/8] writeback: Do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone Mel Gorman
2010-09-16 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-16 9:18 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-16 14:11 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-16 15:18 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-09-16 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-20 9:52 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-21 22:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-20 13:05 ` [PATCH] writeback: Do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being encounted in the current zone fix Mel Gorman
2010-09-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 0/8] Reduce latencies and improve overall reclaim efficiency v2 Andrew Morton
2010-09-17 7:52 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-14 15:28 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-10-18 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-22 12:29 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-11-03 10:50 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-11-10 14:37 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100916151827.GA11405@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).