linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:59:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100920105916.GH1998@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283908781-13810-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:19:33AM +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> We can't use existing hugepage allocation functions to allocate hugepage
> for page migration, because page migration can happen asynchronously with
> the running processes and page migration users should call the allocation
> function with physical addresses (not virtual addresses) as arguments.
> 
> ChangeLog since v3:
> - unify alloc_buddy_huge_page() and alloc_buddy_huge_page_node()
> 
> ChangeLog since v2:
> - remove unnecessary get/put_mems_allowed() (thanks to David Rientjes)
> 
> ChangeLog since v1:
> - add comment on top of alloc_huge_page_no_vma()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h |    3 ++
>  mm/hugetlb.c            |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git v2.6.36-rc2/include/linux/hugetlb.h v2.6.36-rc2/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index f479700..0b73c53 100644
> --- v2.6.36-rc2/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ v2.6.36-rc2/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ struct huge_bootmem_page {
>  	struct hstate *hstate;
>  };
>  
> +struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid);
> +
>  /* arch callback */
>  int __init alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h);
>  
> @@ -303,6 +305,7 @@ static inline struct hstate *page_hstate(struct page *page)
>  
>  #else
>  struct hstate {};
> +#define alloc_huge_page_node(h, nid) NULL
>  #define alloc_bootmem_huge_page(h) NULL
>  #define hstate_file(f) NULL
>  #define hstate_vma(v) NULL
> diff --git v2.6.36-rc2/mm/hugetlb.c v2.6.36-rc2/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6871b41..f526228 100644
> --- v2.6.36-rc2/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ v2.6.36-rc2/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -466,11 +466,23 @@ static void enqueue_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
>  	h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
>  }
>  
> +static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +{
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&h->hugepage_freelists[nid]))
> +		return NULL;
> +	page = list_entry(h->hugepage_freelists[nid].next, struct page, lru);
> +	list_del(&page->lru);
> +	h->free_huge_pages--;
> +	h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> +	return page;
> +}
> +

Ok, this is fine because all you are doing is splitting
dequeue_huge_page_vma()

>  static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
>  				struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  				unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve)
>  {
> -	int nid;
>  	struct page *page = NULL;
>  	struct mempolicy *mpol;
>  	nodemask_t *nodemask;
> @@ -496,19 +508,13 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
>  
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>  						MAX_NR_ZONES - 1, nodemask) {
> -		nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> -		if (cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, htlb_alloc_mask) &&
> -		    !list_empty(&h->hugepage_freelists[nid])) {
> -			page = list_entry(h->hugepage_freelists[nid].next,
> -					  struct page, lru);
> -			list_del(&page->lru);
> -			h->free_huge_pages--;
> -			h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> -
> -			if (!avoid_reserve)
> -				decrement_hugepage_resv_vma(h, vma);
> -
> -			break;
> +		if (cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, htlb_alloc_mask)) {
> +			page = dequeue_huge_page_node(h, zone_to_nid(zone));
> +			if (page) {
> +				if (!avoid_reserve)
> +					decrement_hugepage_resv_vma(h, vma);
> +				break;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}

This looks functionally equivalent so no problems there.

>  err:
> @@ -770,11 +776,10 @@ static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> -			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
> +static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
> -	unsigned int nid;
> +	unsigned int r_nid;
>  

Why the rename, just to avoid changing the value of a function parameter?

>  	if (h->order >= MAX_ORDER)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -812,9 +817,14 @@ static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
> -	page = alloc_pages(htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|
> -					__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_NOWARN,
> -					huge_page_order(h));
> +	if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		page = alloc_pages(htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|
> +				   __GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_NOWARN,
> +				   huge_page_order(h));
> +	else
> +		page = alloc_pages_exact_node(nid,
> +			htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_THISNODE|
> +			__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_NOWARN, huge_page_order(h));
>  

Why not just call alloc_pages_node()?

>  	if (page && arch_prepare_hugepage(page)) {
>  		__free_pages(page, huge_page_order(h));
> @@ -829,13 +839,13 @@ static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
>  		 */
>  		put_page_testzero(page);
>  		VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page));
> -		nid = page_to_nid(page);
> +		r_nid = page_to_nid(page);
>  		set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_huge_page);
>  		/*
>  		 * We incremented the global counters already
>  		 */
> -		h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> -		h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> +		h->nr_huge_pages_node[r_nid]++;
> +		h->surplus_huge_pages_node[r_nid]++;
>  		__count_vm_event(HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC);
>  	} else {
>  		h->nr_huge_pages--;
> @@ -848,6 +858,25 @@ static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * This allocation function is useful in the context where vma is irrelevant.
> + * E.g. soft-offlining uses this function because it only cares physical
> + * address of error page.
> + */
> +struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +{
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	page = dequeue_huge_page_node(h, nid);
> +	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +	if (!page)
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, nid);
> +
> +	return page;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Increase the hugetlb pool such that it can accomodate a reservation
>   * of size 'delta'.
>   */
> @@ -871,7 +900,7 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, int delta)
>  retry:
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i < needed; i++) {
> -		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NULL, 0);
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  		if (!page) {
>  			/*
>  			 * We were not able to allocate enough pages to
> @@ -1052,7 +1081,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
>  	if (!page) {
> -		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, vma, addr);
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  		if (!page) {
>  			hugetlb_put_quota(inode->i_mapping, chg);
>  			return ERR_PTR(-VM_FAULT_SIGBUS);

Mostly it looks ok, the only snag I see is the why you didn't use
alloc_pages_node().

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-20 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-08  1:19 [PATCH 0/10] Hugepage migration (v5) Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 01/10] hugetlb: fix metadata corruption in hugetlb_fault() Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-20 10:47   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-22 20:41     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 02/10] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-20 10:59   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-09-22  4:41     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-22  8:37       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-22 21:05   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-23  8:49     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-23 16:02       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 03/10] hugetlb: redefine hugepage copy functions Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-20 11:03   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-20 11:15     ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-20 11:18       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-23 16:21   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-24  3:24     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 04/10] hugetlb: hugepage migration core Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-20 11:10   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-22  4:59     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-22  8:40       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-23 16:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-24  5:58     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 05/10] HWPOISON, hugetlb: add free check to dequeue_hwpoison_huge_page() Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-23 16:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 06/10] hugetlb: move refcounting in hugepage allocation inside hugetlb_lock Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-23 17:12   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-24  6:47     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 07/10] HWPOSION, hugetlb: recover from free hugepage error when !MF_COUNT_INCREASED Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 08/10] HWPOISON, hugetlb: soft offlining for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 09/10] HWPOISON, hugetlb: fix unpoison " Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-08  1:19 ` [PATCH 10/10] page-types.c: fix name of unpoison interface Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-09 10:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Hugepage migration (v5) Andi Kleen
2010-09-09 22:56   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-20 11:14   ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-03  4:37 [PATCH 0/10] Hugepage migration (v4) Naoya Horiguchi
2010-09-03  4:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration Naoya Horiguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100920105916.GH1998@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).