From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65406B004A for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:14:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:14:12 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V4 Message-ID: <20100924091412.GA8187@csn.ul.ie> References: <1283504926-2120-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20100903160551.05db4a92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100921111741.GB11439@csn.ul.ie> <20100921125814.GF1205@kroah.com> <20100921142309.GA31813@csn.ul.ie> <20100923184942.GW23040@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100923184942.GW23040@kroah.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Greg KH Cc: Rik van Riel , Christoph Lameter , Dave Chinner , Linux Kernel List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim , KOSAKI Motohiro , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , stable@kernel.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: > > > > > > If so, for which -stable tree? .27, .32, and .35 are all > > > currently active. > > > > > > > 2.6.35 for certain. > > > > I would have a strong preference for 2.6.32 as well as it's a baseline for > > a number of distros. The second commit will conflict with per-cpu changes > > but the resolution is straight-forward. > > Thanks for the backport, I've queued these up for .32 and .35 now. > Thanks Greg. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org