From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B310B6B0071 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:12:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:12:11 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: shrinkers: Add node to indicate where to target shrinking Message-ID: <20101022121210.GG10456@basil.fritz.box> References: <20101021235854.GD3270@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101021235854.GD3270@amd> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen List-ID: > Again, I really think it needs to be per zone. Something like inode > cache could still have lots of allocations in ZONE_NORMAL with plenty > of memory free there, but a DMA zone shortage could cause it to trash > the caches. For hwpoison ideally I would like it per page. But that's harder of course. But if all the shrinkers are adapted it may be worth thinking about that. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org