From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] writeback: quit background/periodic work when other works are enqueued
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:07:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101101120733.GA9006@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100914124033.GA4874@quack.suse.cz>
Hi Jan,
Sorry for the long delay!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:40:33PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 13-09-10 20:31:12, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >
> > Background writeback and kupdate-style writeback are easily livelockable
> > (from a definition of their target). This is inconvenient because it can
> > make sync(1) stall forever waiting on its queued work to be finished.
> > Fix the problem by interrupting background and kupdate writeback if there
> > is some other work to do. We can return to them after completing all the
> > queued work.
> I actually have a slightly updated version with a better changelog:
>
> Background writeback are easily livelockable (from a definition of their
> target). This is inconvenient because it can make sync(1) stall forever waiting
> on its queued work to be finished. Generally, when a flusher thread has
> some work queued, someone submitted the work to achieve a goal more specific
> than what background writeback does. So it makes sense to give it a priority
> over a generic page cleaning.
>
> Thus we interrupt background writeback if there is some other work to do. We
> return to the background writeback after completing all the queued work.
>
> Could you please update it? Thanks.
> Honza
>
> PS: I've also attached the full patch if that's more convenient for you.
You patches are more complete than mine, so let's use them. However I
do prefer to have a standalone wb_check_background_flush() that is
called _after_ wb_check_old_data_flush(). This helps make the writeout
a bit more ordered and the separation itself looks a bit more clean to
me.
Followed are the slightly updated patches. IMHO they are straightforward
fixes that could be merged before other writeback changes.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-01 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-13 12:31 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] transfer vmscan pageout works to the flusher thread Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] writeback: integrated background work Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 22:46 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-14 0:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 12:45 ` Jan Kara
2010-09-13 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: quit background/periodic work when other works are enqueued Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 12:40 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-01 12:07 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-11-01 15:08 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-01 15:13 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-01 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] writeback: integrated background writeback work Wu Fengguang
2010-11-01 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] writeback: stop background/kupdate works from livelocking other works Wu Fengguang
2010-11-01 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-02 1:57 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-05 12:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-01 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] writeback: integrated background writeback work Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 20:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-01 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Wu Fengguang
2010-11-02 1:55 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-05 12:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-13 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: introduce bdi_start_inode_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 13:36 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-01 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 12:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] vmscan: transfer async file writeback to the flusher Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101101120733.GA9006@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).