From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01CC26B00AE for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:42:11 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits Message-ID: <20101106104211.GL13830@dastard> References: <20100912154945.758129106@intel.com> <20101012141716.GA26702@infradead.org> <20101013030733.GV4681@dastard> <20101013082611.GA6733@localhost> <20101013092627.GY4681@dastard> <20101101062446.GK2715@dastard> <20101104034119.GA18910@localhost> <20101104131228.GA22718@lst.de> <20101105145639.GA6300@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101105145639.GA6300@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm , LKML , Theodore Ts'o , Jan Kara , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , KOSAKI Motohiro , Chris Mason , "Li, Shaohua" , Greg Thelen List-ID: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:56:39PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:12:28PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:41:19AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > I'm feeling relatively good about the first 14 patches to do IO-less > > > balance_dirty_pages() and larger writeback chunk size. I'll repost > > > them separately as v2 after returning to Shanghai. > > > > Going for as small as possible patchsets is a pretty good idea. Just > > getting the I/O less balance_dirty_pages on it's own would be a really > > good start, as that's one of the really criticial pieces of > > infrastructure that a lot of people are waiting for. Getting it into > > linux-mm/linux-next ASAP so that it gets a lot of testing would be > > highly useful. > > OK, I'll do a smaller IO-less balance_dirty_pages() patchset (it's > good to know which part is the most relevant one, which is not always > obvious by my limited field experiences), which will further reduce > the possible risk of unexpected regressions. Which is good given the recent history of writeback mods. :/ > Currently the -mm tree includes Greg's patchset "memcg: per cgroup > dirty page accounting". I'm going to rebase my patches onto it, > however I'd like to first make sure if Greg's patches are going to be > pushed in the next merge window. I personally have no problem with > that. Andrew? Well, I'd prefer that you provide a git tree that I can just pull into my current working branch to test. Having to pull in a thousand other changes to test your writeback changes makes it much harder for me as I'd have to establish a new stable performance/behavioural baseline before starting to analyse your series. If it's based on mainline then I've already got that baseline.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org