From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:03:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118110301.GA16625@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117165309.fa859fd3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:53:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:52:30 -0500
> "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:11:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > I don't think ->page_mkwrite can be worked around - we need that to
> > > be called on the first write fault of any mmap()d page to ensure it
> > > is set up correctly for writeback. If we don't get write faults
> > > after the page is mlock()d, then we need the ->page_mkwrite() call
> > > during the mlock() call.
> >
> > OK, so I'm not an mm hacker, so maybe I'm missing something. Could
> > part of this be fixed by simply sending the write faults for
> > mlock()'ed pages, so page_mkwrite() gets called when the page is
> > dirtied. Seems like a real waste to have the file system pre-allocate
> > all of the blocks for a mlock()'ed region. Why does mlock() have to
> > result in the write faults getting suppressed when the page is
> > actually dirtied?
This is actually what the patch does - by having mlock() use a read fault,
pages are loaded in memory and mlocked, but the ptes are not marked as
writable so that a later write access will be caught as a write fault at
that time (with all the usual dirtying and page_mkwrite() callbacks).
> Yup, I don't think it would be too bad to take a minor fault each time
> an mlocked page transitions from clean->dirty.
>
> In fact we should already be doing that, after the mlocked page gets
> written back by kupdate? Hope so!
Yes, handle_mm_fault() is careful to never create writable ptes pointing
to clean file pages, so that a later write fault will correctly dirty
the corresponding page.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-17 12:23 [PATCH 0/3] Avoid dirtying pages during mlock Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] do_wp_page: remove the 'reuse' flag Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] do_wp_page: clarify dirty_page handling Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 22:05 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 22:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 23:11 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 23:31 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 1:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 23:52 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-18 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 11:03 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-11-18 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-18 17:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-11-19 7:23 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 13:38 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-19 13:42 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-19 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-19 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-19 23:22 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-20 0:29 ` Dustin Kirkland
2010-11-19 23:31 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 23:54 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-18 5:46 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 10:43 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-18 18:00 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101118110301.GA16625@google.com \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).