linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:02:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101124100242.GW19571@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=KunDRwVd73vtbng0F+a=QBgJeV5BXrewYJa3R@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:24:35AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> <SNIP>
> >>
> >> +static void __pagevec_lru_deactive(struct pagevec *pvec)
> >> +{
> >
> > Might be worth commenting that this function must be called with pre-emption
> > disabled. FWIW, I am reasonably sure your implementation is prefectly safe
> > but a note wouldn't hurt.
> 
> Will fix.
> 

Thanks

> >
> >> +     int i, lru, file;
> >> +
> >> +     struct zone *zone = NULL;
> >> +
> >> +     for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> >> +             struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> >> +             struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
> >> +
> >> +             if (pagezone != zone) {
> >> +                     if (zone)
> >> +                             spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> +                     zone = pagezone;
> >> +                     spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> +             }
> >> +
> >> +             if (PageLRU(page)) {
> >> +                     if (PageActive(page)) {
> >> +                             file = page_is_file_cache(page);
> >> +                             lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> >> +                             del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page,
> >> +                                             lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
> >> +                             ClearPageActive(page);
> >> +                             ClearPageReferenced(page);
> >> +                             add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> >> +                             __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> >> +
> >
> > What about memcg, do we not need to be calling mem_cgroup_add_lru_list() here
> > as well? I'm looking at the differences between what move_active_pages_to_lru()
> 
> Recently, add_page_to_lru_list contains mem_cgroup_add_lru_list.
> 

My bad, you're right. I was thrown by move_active_pages_to_lru() needing to
do memcg stuff manually and didn't spot why it ok to miss it here.

> > is doing and this. I'm wondering if it'd be worth your whole building a list
> > of active pages that are to be moved to the inactive list and passing them
> > to move_active_pages_to_lru() ? I confuess I have not thought about it deeply
> > so it might be a terrible suggestion but it might reduce duplication of code.
> 
> Firstly I tried it so I sent a patch about making
> move_to_active_pages_to_lru more generic.
> move_to_active_pages_to_lru needs zone argument so I need gathering
> pages per zone in truncate.
> I don't want for user of the function to consider even zone and
> zone->lru_lock handling.
> 
> I think the lru_demote_pages could be used elsewhere(ex, readahead max
> size heuristic).
> So it's generic and easy to use. :)
> 

Ok, that's fair enough.

> >
> >> +                             update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 0);
> >> +                     }
> >> +             }
> >> +     }
> >> +     if (zone)
> >> +             spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> +
> >> +     release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr, pvec->cold);
> >> +     pagevec_reinit(pvec);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  /*
> >>   * Drain pages out of the cpu's pagevecs.
> >>   * Either "cpu" is the current CPU, and preemption has already been
> >> @@ -292,8 +333,28 @@ static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
> >>               pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
> >>               local_irq_restore(flags);
> >>       }
> >> +
> >> +     pvec = &per_cpu(lru_deactive_pvecs, cpu);
> >> +     if (pagevec_count(pvec))
> >> +             __pagevec_lru_deactive(pvec);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Function used to forecefully demote a page to the head of the inactive
> >> + * list.
> >
> > s/forecefully/forcefully/
> >
> > The comment should also state *why* and under what circumstances we move
> > pages to the inactive list like this. Also based on the discussions
> > elsewhere in this thread, it'd be nice to include a comment why it's the
> > head of the inactive list and not the tail.
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> Thanks for the comment, Mel.
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2010-11-24 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-21 14:30 [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 14:30 ` [RFC 2/2] Prevent promotion of page in madvise_dontneed Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 14:38   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 16:34   ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-22  0:31     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22 22:21   ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  4:57     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  9:50     ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:49       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 15:21 ` [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Ben Gamari
2010-11-23  7:16   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 13:48     ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 23:48       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 14:49     ` [RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 15:35       ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-24  0:17       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 14:49     ` [PATCH 1/3] Add fadvise interface wrapper Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:49     ` [PATCH 2/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in sender Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:49     ` [PATCH 3/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in receiver Ben Gamari
2010-11-22  1:17 ` [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Rik van Riel
2010-11-22 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  4:52   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  5:01     ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  5:23       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  5:22         ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  5:45           ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  5:48             ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  6:05               ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  7:15                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  7:44                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  7:53                     ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  8:02                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  9:43               ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:32                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  9:38       ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 14:55         ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:58           ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 20:35             ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 22:10               ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:45                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-24 18:01                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23  7:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23  7:40   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  7:42     ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23  8:01     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23  8:44       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  9:02         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23  9:05           ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23  9:07             ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 14:57   ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-24  0:13     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23  9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:24   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-24 10:02     ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101124100242.GW19571@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).