From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:02:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101124100242.GW19571@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=KunDRwVd73vtbng0F+a=QBgJeV5BXrewYJa3R@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:24:35AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> <SNIP>
> >>
> >> +static void __pagevec_lru_deactive(struct pagevec *pvec)
> >> +{
> >
> > Might be worth commenting that this function must be called with pre-emption
> > disabled. FWIW, I am reasonably sure your implementation is prefectly safe
> > but a note wouldn't hurt.
>
> Will fix.
>
Thanks
> >
> >> + int i, lru, file;
> >> +
> >> + struct zone *zone = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> >> + struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> >> + struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
> >> +
> >> + if (pagezone != zone) {
> >> + if (zone)
> >> + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> + zone = pagezone;
> >> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (PageLRU(page)) {
> >> + if (PageActive(page)) {
> >> + file = page_is_file_cache(page);
> >> + lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> >> + del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page,
> >> + lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
> >> + ClearPageActive(page);
> >> + ClearPageReferenced(page);
> >> + add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> >> + __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> >> +
> >
> > What about memcg, do we not need to be calling mem_cgroup_add_lru_list() here
> > as well? I'm looking at the differences between what move_active_pages_to_lru()
>
> Recently, add_page_to_lru_list contains mem_cgroup_add_lru_list.
>
My bad, you're right. I was thrown by move_active_pages_to_lru() needing to
do memcg stuff manually and didn't spot why it ok to miss it here.
> > is doing and this. I'm wondering if it'd be worth your whole building a list
> > of active pages that are to be moved to the inactive list and passing them
> > to move_active_pages_to_lru() ? I confuess I have not thought about it deeply
> > so it might be a terrible suggestion but it might reduce duplication of code.
>
> Firstly I tried it so I sent a patch about making
> move_to_active_pages_to_lru more generic.
> move_to_active_pages_to_lru needs zone argument so I need gathering
> pages per zone in truncate.
> I don't want for user of the function to consider even zone and
> zone->lru_lock handling.
>
> I think the lru_demote_pages could be used elsewhere(ex, readahead max
> size heuristic).
> So it's generic and easy to use. :)
>
Ok, that's fair enough.
> >
> >> + update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 0);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + if (zone)
> >> + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >> +
> >> + release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr, pvec->cold);
> >> + pagevec_reinit(pvec);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Drain pages out of the cpu's pagevecs.
> >> * Either "cpu" is the current CPU, and preemption has already been
> >> @@ -292,8 +333,28 @@ static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
> >> pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
> >> local_irq_restore(flags);
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + pvec = &per_cpu(lru_deactive_pvecs, cpu);
> >> + if (pagevec_count(pvec))
> >> + __pagevec_lru_deactive(pvec);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Function used to forecefully demote a page to the head of the inactive
> >> + * list.
> >
> > s/forecefully/forcefully/
> >
> > The comment should also state *why* and under what circumstances we move
> > pages to the inactive list like this. Also based on the discussions
> > elsewhere in this thread, it'd be nice to include a comment why it's the
> > head of the inactive list and not the tail.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Thanks for the comment, Mel.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-24 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 14:30 [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 14:30 ` [RFC 2/2] Prevent promotion of page in madvise_dontneed Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 14:38 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 16:34 ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-22 0:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 4:57 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 9:50 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:49 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 15:21 ` [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 7:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 13:48 ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 23:48 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 15:35 ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-24 0:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add fadvise interface wrapper Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in sender Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in receiver Ben Gamari
2010-11-22 1:17 ` [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages Rik van Riel
2010-11-22 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 4:52 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 5:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 5:23 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 5:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 5:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 6:05 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 7:15 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 7:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 8:02 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:32 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 9:38 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 14:55 ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-23 14:58 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 22:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-24 18:01 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 7:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 7:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 7:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 8:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 8:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 9:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 9:05 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 9:07 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-23 14:57 ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-24 0:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 23:24 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-24 10:02 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101124100242.GW19571@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).