Re: Free memory never fully used, swapping

[Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Please try SLAB instead SLUB (it can be switched by kernel build option).
> > SLUB try to use high order allocation implicitly.
> 
> SLAB uses orders 0-1. Order is fixed per slab cache and determined based
> on object size at slab creation.
> 
> SLUB uses orders 0-3. Falls back to smallest order if alloc order cannot
> be met by the page allocator.
> 
> One can reduce SLUB to SLAB orders by specifying the following kernel
> commandline parameter:
> 
> slub_max_order=1

Can we also mess with these /sys files on the fly?

[/sys/kernel/slab]# grep . kmalloc-*/order | sort -n -k2 -t-
kmalloc-8/order:0
kmalloc-16/order:0
kmalloc-32/order:0
kmalloc-64/order:0
kmalloc-96/order:0
kmalloc-128/order:0
kmalloc-192/order:0
kmalloc-256/order:1
kmalloc-512/order:2
kmalloc-1024/order:3
kmalloc-2048/order:3
kmalloc-4096/order:3
kmalloc-8192/order:3

I'm not familiar with how slub works, but I assume there's some overhead
or some reason not to just use order 0 for <= kmalloc-4096?  Or is it
purely just trying to reduce cpu by calling alloc_pages less often?

Simon-

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>