linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Reclaim invalidated page ASAP
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:18:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130091822.GJ13268@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101130100933.82E9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:10:20AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > invalidate_mapping_pages is very big hint to reclaimer.
> > It means user doesn't want to use the page any more.
> > So in order to prevent working set page eviction, this patch
> > move the page into tail of inactive list by PG_reclaim.
> > 
> > Please, remember that pages in inactive list are working set
> > as well as active list. If we don't move pages into inactive list's
> > tail, pages near by tail of inactive list can be evicted although
> > we have a big clue about useless pages. It's totally bad.
> > 
> > Now PG_readahead/PG_reclaim is shared.
> > fe3cba17 added ClearPageReclaim into clear_page_dirty_for_io for
> > preventing fast reclaiming readahead marker page.
> > 
> > In this series, PG_reclaim is used by invalidated page, too.
> > If VM find the page is invalidated and it's dirty, it sets PG_reclaim
> > to reclaim asap. Then, when the dirty page will be writeback,
> > clear_page_dirty_for_io will clear PG_reclaim unconditionally.
> > It disturbs this serie's goal.
> > 
> > I think it's okay to clear PG_readahead when the page is dirty, not
> > writeback time. So this patch moves ClearPageReadahead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> 
> I still dislike this one. I doubt this trick makes much benefit in real
> world workload.
> 

I would agree except as said elsewhere, it's a chicken and egg problem.
We don't have a real world test because fadvise is not useful in its
current iteration. I'm hoping that there will be a test comparing

rsync		on vanilla kernel
rsync		on patched kernel
rsync+patch	on vanilla kernel
rsync+patch	on patched kernel

Are the results of such a test likely to happen?

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-29 15:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] f/madivse(DONTNEED) support Minchan Kim
2010-11-29 15:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] deactivate invalidated pages Minchan Kim
2010-11-30  1:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30  5:22   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-30  6:18     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-29 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] Reclaim invalidated page ASAP Minchan Kim
2010-11-29 16:57   ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-29 22:41     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-30  9:16       ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-30 14:04         ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-30 11:20       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-30 14:03         ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-30  1:10   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30  9:18     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-11-30 14:01       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-30 14:11       ` Ben Gamari
2010-11-29 15:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Prevent activation of page in madvise_dontneed Minchan Kim
2010-11-30  1:08   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 11:35   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01  0:50     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-30 18:34   ` Hugh Dickins
2010-12-01  0:49     ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101130091822.GJ13268@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).