From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode fix
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:03:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202120347.GS13268@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201102732.GK15564@cmpxchg.org>
As suggested by Johannes, rename reclaim_mode to reclaim_mode_t. This is
a fix to the mmotm patch
broken-out/mm-vmscan-rename-lumpy_mode-to-reclaim_mode.patch.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 42a4859..a9390fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@
* RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION: For high-order allocations, reclaim a number of
* order-0 pages and then compact the zone
*/
-typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode;
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE ((__force reclaim_mode)0x01u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC ((__force reclaim_mode)0x02u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC ((__force reclaim_mode)0x04u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM ((__force reclaim_mode)0x08u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION ((__force reclaim_mode)0x10u)
+typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode_t;
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE ((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x01u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC ((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x02u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC ((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x04u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM ((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x08u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION ((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x10u)
struct scan_control {
/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct scan_control {
* Intend to reclaim enough continuous memory rather than reclaim
* enough amount of memory. i.e, mode for high order allocation.
*/
- reclaim_mode reclaim_mode;
+ reclaim_mode_t reclaim_mode;
/* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(unsigned long scanned, gfp_t gfp_mask,
static void set_reclaim_mode(int priority, struct scan_control *sc,
bool sync)
{
- reclaim_mode syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
+ reclaim_mode_t syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
/*
* Initially assume we are entering either lumpy reclaim or
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/7] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations V2 Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: compaction: Add trace events for memory compaction activity Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: vmscan: Convert lumpy_mode into a bitmask Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 11:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 11:56 ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-02 11:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-02 12:03 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and use compaction instead of lumpy reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:56 ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 11:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: migration: Allow migration to operate asynchronously and avoid synchronous compaction in the faster path Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: migration: Cleanup migrate_pages API by matching types for offlining and sync Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: compaction: Perform a faster migration scan when migrating asynchronously Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations V2 Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101202120347.GS13268@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).