From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] radix_tree_destroy?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:15:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101222031507.GE30700@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fbf2264-04be-4899-9c1f-5c2e0942b158@default>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:44:06AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > +void radix_tree_destroy(struct radix_tree_root *root, void
> > (*slot_free)(void *))
> > > +{
> > > + if (root->rnode == NULL)
> > > + return;
> > > + if (root->height == 0)
> > > + slot_free(root->rnode);
> >
> > Don't you want indirect_to_ptr(root->rnode) here? You probably also
> > don't
> > want the callback in the !radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr() case.
> >
> > > + else {
> > > + radix_tree_node_destroy(root->rnode, root->height,
> > slot_free);
> > > + radix_tree_node_free(root->rnode);
> > > + root->height = 0;
> > > + }
> > > + root->rnode = NULL;
> > > +}
> >
> > The above will handle the nodes, but what about the root? It looks like
> > you're at least going to leak tags on the root, so at the very least
> > you'd still want a root_tag_clear_all() here.
>
> Thanks for your help. Will do both. My use model doesn't require
> tags or rcu, so my hacked version of radix_tree_destroy missed those
> subtleties.
>
> So my assumption was correct? There is no way to efficiently
> destroy an entire radix tree without adding this new routine?
>
Not that I'm specifically aware of, no. Most of the in-tree radix users
bury the tree pointer under some other data structure that is separately
accounted and then manually balanced with the insert/remove pair. I
suppose your use case is modular and you wish to tear down the root
completely on exit. In that case, if you have items you need to iterate
over to clean up after for a clean exit anyways then simply wrapping in
to radix_tree_delete() at that point for node-at-a-time freeing would be
consistent with in-tree usage today. It'd be interesting to know what
precisely your use case is and why the existing node-at-a-time delete
semantics are sub-optimal for you, though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-16 16:27 [RFC] radix_tree_destroy? Dan Magenheimer
2010-12-17 3:27 ` Paul Mundt
2010-12-17 18:44 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-12-22 3:15 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101222031507.GE30700@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).