From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] memory control groups
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:48:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110120101844.GI2897@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117191359.GI2212@cmpxchg.org>
* Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> [2011-01-17 20:14:00]:
> Hello,
>
> on the MM summit, I would like to talk about the current state of
> memory control groups, the features and extensions that are currently
> being developed for it, and what their status is.
>
> I am especially interested in talking about the current runtime memory
> overhead memcg comes with (1% of ram) and what we can do to shrink it.
>
> In comparison to how efficiently struct page is packed, and given that
> distro kernels come with memcg enabled per default, I think we should
> put a bit more thought into how struct page_cgroup (which exists for
> every page in the system as well) is organized.
>
> I have a patch series that removes the page backpointer from struct
> page_cgroup by storing a node ID (or section ID, depending on whether
> sparsemem is configured) in the free bits of pc->flags.
>
> I also plan on replacing the pc->mem_cgroup pointer with an ID
> (KAMEZAWA-san has patches for that), and move it to pc->flags too.
> Every flag not used means doubling the amount of possible control
> groups, so I have patches that get rid of some flags currently
> allocated, including PCG_CACHE, PCG_ACCT_LRU, and PCG_MIGRATION.
>
> [ I meant to send those out much earlier already, but a bug in the
> migration rework was not responding to my yelling 'Marco', and now my
> changes collide horribly with THP, so it will take another rebase. ]
>
> The per-memcg dirty accounting work e.g. allocates a bunch of new bits
> in pc->flags and I'd like to hash out if this leaves enough room for
> the structure packing I described, or whether we can come up with a
> different way of tracking state.
>
> Would other people be interested in discussing this?
>
I would definitely be if I am invited to the LSF/MM summit. Even
otherwise we should discuss this over email
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 19:14 [LSF/MM TOPIC] memory control groups Johannes Weiner
2011-01-18 1:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-18 8:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-18 9:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-18 10:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-19 0:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-18 8:17 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-01-18 8:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-07 5:27 ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-18 8:53 ` CAI Qian
2011-01-20 10:18 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2011-02-06 15:45 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-02-07 5:26 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110120101844.GI2897@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).