From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@kernel.dk, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
cl@linux.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][RESEND] Provide control over unmapped pages (v4)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:57:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208155756.e149c3b6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201165533.12377.11775.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:25:45 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Changelog v4
> 1. Add max_unmapped_ratio and use that as the upper limit
> to check when to shrink the unmapped page cache (Christoph
> Lameter)
>
> Changelog v2
> 1. Use a config option to enable the code (Andrew Morton)
> 2. Explain the magic tunables in the code or at-least attempt
> to explain them (General comment)
> 3. Hint uses of the boot parameter with unlikely (Andrew Morton)
> 4. Use better names (balanced is not a good naming convention)
>
> Provide control using zone_reclaim() and a boot parameter. The
> code reuses functionality from zone_reclaim() to isolate unmapped
> pages and reclaim them as a priority, ahead of other mapped pages.
> A new sysctl for max_unmapped_ratio is provided and set to 16,
> indicating 16% of the total zone pages are unmapped, we start
> shrinking unmapped page cache.
We'll need some documentation for sysctl_max_unmapped_ratio, please.
In Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt, I suppose.
It will be interesting to find out what this ratio refers to. it
apears to be a percentage. We've had problem in the past where 1% was
way too much and we had to change the kernel to provide much
finer-grained control.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -306,7 +306,10 @@ struct zone {
> /*
> * zone reclaim becomes active if more unmapped pages exist.
> */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_UNMAPPED_PAGE_CONTROL) || defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> unsigned long min_unmapped_pages;
> + unsigned long max_unmapped_pages;
> +#endif
This change breaks the connection between min_unmapped_pages and its
documentation, and fails to document max_unmapped_pages.
Also, afacit if CONFIG_NUMA=y and CONFIG_UNMAPPED_PAGE_CONTROL=n,
max_unmapped_pages will be present in the kernel image and will appear
in /proc but it won't actually do anything. Seems screwed up and
misleading.
>
> ...
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_UNMAPPED_PAGECACHE_CONTROL)
> +/*
> + * Routine to reclaim unmapped pages, inspired from the code under
> + * CONFIG_NUMA that does unmapped page and slab page control by keeping
> + * min_unmapped_pages in the zone. We currently reclaim just unmapped
> + * pages, slab control will come in soon, at which point this routine
> + * should be called reclaim cached pages
> + */
> +unsigned long reclaim_unmapped_pages(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> + struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(unmapped_page_control) &&
> + (zone_unmapped_file_pages(zone) > zone->min_unmapped_pages)) {
> + struct scan_control nsc;
> + unsigned long nr_pages;
> +
> + nsc = *sc;
> +
> + nsc.swappiness = 0;
> + nsc.may_writepage = 0;
> + nsc.may_unmap = 0;
> + nsc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> +
> + nr_pages = zone_unmapped_file_pages(zone) -
> + zone->min_unmapped_pages;
> + /*
> + * We don't want to be too aggressive with our
> + * reclaim, it is our best effort to control
> + * unmapped pages
> + */
> + nr_pages >>= 3;
> +
> + zone_reclaim_pages(zone, &nsc, nr_pages);
> + return nsc.nr_reclaimed;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
This returns an undocumented ulong which is never used by callers.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 16:54 [PATCH 0/3][RESEND] Provide unmapped page cache control (v4) Balbir Singh
2011-02-01 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3][RESEND] Move zone_reclaim() outside of CONFIG_NUMA (v4) Balbir Singh
2011-02-01 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3][RESEND] Refactor zone_reclaim code (v4) Balbir Singh
2011-02-01 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3][RESEND] Provide control over unmapped pages (v4) Balbir Singh
2011-02-08 23:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-02-09 11:16 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-24 17:08 ` Satoru Moriya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110208155756.e149c3b6.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).