From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B68BD8D0039 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:46:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:37:31 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] exec: unify compat_do_execve() code Message-ID: <20110226123731.GC4416@redhat.com> References: <20101130200129.GG11905@redhat.com> <20101201182747.GB6143@redhat.com> <20110225175202.GA19059@redhat.com> <20110225175314.GD19059@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , linux-mm , pageexec@freemail.hu, Solar Designer , Eugene Teo , Brad Spengler , Roland McGrath , Milton Miller On 02/25, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Teach get_arg_ptr() to handle compat = T case correctly. > > Does it? I think it does. > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > +int compat_do_execve(char *filename, > > + compat_uptr_t __user *argv, > > + compat_uptr_t __user *envp, > > + struct pt_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + return do_execve_common(filename, > > + (void __user *)argv, (void __user*)envp, > > + regs, true); > > +} > > +#endif > > I really suspect this should be something like > > typedef union { > compat_uptr_t compat; > const char __user *native; > } conditional_user_ptr_t; Personally I don't really like this union, to me "void __user*" looks better, but I won't insist. > int compat_do_execve(char *filename, > compat_uptr_t argv, > compat_uptr_t envp, > { > return do_execve_common(filename, > compat_ptr(argv), compat_ptr(envp), regs); Indeed! But, again, this has nothing to do with this series. We can do this later and change the callers in arch/. > where that 'do_execve_common()' takes it's arguments as > > union conditional_user_ptr_t __user *argv, > union conditional_user_ptr_t __user *envp > > and then in get_arg_ptr() we do the proper union member dereference > depending on the "compat" flag. Once again, to me "void __user*" looks better (just simpler). In this case get_arg_ptr() becomes (without const/__user for the clarity) void *get_arg_ptr(void **argv, int argc, bool compat) { char *ptr; #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT if (unlikely(compat)) { compat_uptr_t *a = argv; compat_uptr_t p; if (get_user(p, a + argc)) return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT); return compat_ptr(p); } #endif if (get_user(ptr, argv + argc)) return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT); return ptr; } Otherwise, get_arg_ptr() should return conditional_user_ptr_t as well, this looks like the unnecessary complication to me, but of course this is subjective. So, what do you think? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org