linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 for 2.6.38] oom: oom_kill_process: don't set TIF_MEMDIE if !p->mm
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:31:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314203152.GA25080@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=YnG7tYCSrCPTNSQANOkD2MkP0tMjbOyZbx4NG@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/14, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > oom_kill_process() simply sets TIF_MEMDIE and returns if PF_EXITING.
> > This is very wrong by many reasons. In particular, this thread can
> > be the dead group leader. Check p->mm != NULL.
>
> Explain more, please. Maybe I'm missing some context because I wasn't
> cc'd on the original thread, but PF_EXITING gets set by exit_signal(),
> and exit_mm() is called almost immediately afterwards which will set
> p->mm to NULL.
>
> So afaik, this will basically just remove the whole point of the code
> entirely - so why not remove it then?

I am afraid I am going to lie... But iirc I tried to remove this code
before. Can't find the previous discussion, probably I am wrong.

Anyway. I never understood why do we have this special case.

> The combination of testing PF_EXITING and p->mm just doesn't seem to
> make any sense.

To me, it doesn't make too much sense even if we do not check ->mm.

But. I _think_ the intent was to wait until this "exiting" process
does exit_mm() and frees the memory. This is like the
"the process of releasing memory " code in select_bad_process(). Once
again, this is only my speculation.

In any case, this patch doesn't pretend to be the right fix.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-14 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-01 19:09 [patch] oom: prevent unnecessary oom kills or kernel panics David Rientjes
2011-03-03  1:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-03 19:53   ` David Rientjes
2011-03-06 11:14     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-06 22:06       ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  0:24         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-08  2:01         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-08 13:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-08 23:57     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 10:36       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-09 11:06       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-09 20:32         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-10 12:05           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 15:40             ` [PATCH 0/1] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 15:41               ` [PATCH 1/1] oom_kill_task: mark every thread as TIF_MEMDIE Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-13  1:08                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-10 16:36               ` [PATCH 0/1] select_bad_process: improve the PF_EXITING check Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 16:37                 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 16:40                 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 17:18                   ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-10 17:19                     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-13  1:06             ` [patch] oom: prevent unnecessary oom kills or kernel panics David Rientjes
2011-03-09 23:19       ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-11 19:45         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-12 12:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-12 13:43             ` [PATCH 0/3] oom: TIF_MEMDIE/PF_EXITING fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-12 13:44               ` [PATCH 1/3] oom: oom_kill_task: mark every thread as TIF_MEMDIE Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-13  1:14                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-12 13:44               ` [PATCH 2/3] oom: select_bad_process: improve the PF_EXITING check Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-12 13:44               ` [PATCH 3/3] oom: select_bad_process: use same_thread_group() Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-12 19:40               ` [PATCH 0/3] oom: TIF_MEMDIE/PF_EXITING fixes Hugh Dickins
2011-03-13  8:53                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-13 21:27                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 19:04                   ` [PATCH 0/3 for 2.6.38] oom: fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 19:04                     ` [PATCH 1/3 for 2.6.38] oom: oom_kill_process: don't set TIF_MEMDIE if !p->mm Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 19:35                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-14 20:31                         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-03-14 20:32                         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15 19:12                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-15 19:51                             ` David Rientjes
2011-03-14 20:22                       ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15 18:53                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-15 19:54                           ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15 21:16                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 19:05                     ` [PATCH 2/3 for 2.6.38] oom: select_bad_process: ignore TIF_MEMDIE zombies Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 20:50                       ` David Rientjes
2011-03-14 19:05                     ` [PATCH 3/3 for 2.6.38] oom: oom_kill_process: fix the child_points logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 20:41                       ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15 19:21                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-13 11:36               ` [PATCH 0/3] oom: TIF_MEMDIE/PF_EXITING fixes KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-13  1:11             ` [patch] oom: prevent unnecessary oom kills or kernel panics David Rientjes
2011-03-13  1:15               ` [patch -mm] oom: avoid deferring oom killer if exiting task is being traced David Rientjes
2011-03-14 17:40                 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110314203152.GA25080@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).