From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: Implement IO-less balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110316202252.GF13562@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110316195844.GD4456@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:58:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
[..]
> > > > Had a query.
> > > >
> > > > - What makes sure that flusher thread will not stop writing back till all
> > > > the waiters on the bdi have been woken up. IIUC, flusher thread will
> > > > stop once global background ratio is with-in limit. Is it possible that
> > > > there are still some waiter on some bdi waiting for more pages to finish
> > > > writeback and that might not happen for sometime.
> > > Yes, this can possibly happen but once distribute_page_completions()
> > > gets called (after a given time), it will notice that we are below limits
> > > and wake all waiters.
> > > Under normal circumstances, we should have a decent
> > > estimate when distribute_page_completions() needs to be called and that
> > > should be long before flusher thread finishes it's work. But in cases when
> > > a bdi has only a small share of global dirty limit, what you describe can
> > > possibly happen.
> >
> > So if a bdi share is small then it can happen that global background
> > threshold is fine but per bdi threshold is not. That means
> > task_bdi_threshold is also above limit and IIUC, distribute_page_completion()
> > will not wake up the waiter until bdi_task_limit_exceeded() is in control.
> It will wake them. What you miss is the check right at the beginning of
> distribute_page_completions():
> dirty_exceeded = check_dirty_limits(bdi, &st);
> if (dirty_exceeded < DIRTY_MAY_EXCEED_LIMIT) {
> /* Wakeup everybody */
> ...
>
> When we are globally below (background+limit)/2, dirty_exceeded is set to
> DIRTY_OK or DIRTY_BACKGROUND and thus we just wake all the waiters.
Ok, thanks. Now I see it.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 22:31 [PATCH RFC 0/5] IO-less balance_dirty_pages() v2 (simple approach) Jan Kara
2011-03-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pages Jan Kara
2011-03-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: Properly reflect task dirty limits in dirty_exceeded logic Jan Kara
2011-03-09 21:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-14 20:44 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-15 15:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: Implement IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Jan Kara
2011-03-10 0:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-14 20:48 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-15 15:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-16 21:26 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-03-16 22:53 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-03-16 16:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-16 19:10 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-16 19:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-16 19:58 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-16 20:22 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-03-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: Remove low limit from sync_writeback_pages() Jan Kara
2011-03-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: Autotune interval between distribution of page completions Jan Kara
2011-03-17 15:46 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] IO-less balance_dirty_pages() v2 (simple approach) Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-03-17 15:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-17 16:24 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-03-17 16:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-17 17:32 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-17 18:55 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-03-17 22:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-18 14:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-22 21:43 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-23 4:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-25 13:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-25 23:05 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-28 2:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-28 15:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-29 2:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-29 2:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-29 5:59 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-29 7:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-03-29 7:52 ` Wu Fengguang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-04 1:38 [RFC PATCH 0/5] IO-less balance dirty pages Jan Kara
2011-02-04 1:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: Implement IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Jan Kara
2011-02-04 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 14:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-02-04 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-04 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 15:46 ` Jan Kara
2011-02-22 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-04 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 14:56 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110316202252.GF13562@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).