From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: give current access to memory reserves if it's trying to die
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:53:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317165319.07be118e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103091327260.15068@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:27:50 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> When a memcg is oom and current has already received a SIGKILL, then give
> it access to memory reserves with a higher scheduling priority so that it
> may quickly exit and free its memory.
>
> This is identical to the global oom killer and is done even before
> checking for panic_on_oom: a pending SIGKILL here while panic_on_oom is
> selected is guaranteed to have come from userspace; the thread only needs
> access to memory reserves to exit and thus we don't unnecessarily panic
> the machine until the kernel has no last resort to free memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -537,6 +537,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> unsigned int points = 0;
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> + /*
> + * If current has a pending SIGKILL, then automatically select it. The
> + * goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may quickly exit and free
> + * its memory.
> + */
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
> + set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE);
> + boost_dying_task_prio(current, NULL);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
> limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
The code duplication seems a bit gratuitous.
Was it deliberate that mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() ignores the oom
notifier callbacks?
(Why does that notifier list exist at all? Wouldn't it be better to do
this via a vmscan shrinker? Perhaps altered to be passed the scanning
priority?)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 0:24 [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay David Rientjes
2011-02-08 1:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:13 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08 2:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08 10:25 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-09 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-10 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-16 3:15 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-23 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-24 0:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-24 0:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:11 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 0:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 0:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 0:51 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 1:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08 1:33 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 3:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 3:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 3:56 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 4:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 5:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 5:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 23:49 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 6:44 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 7:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 21:12 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09 21:27 ` [patch] memcg: give current access to memory reserves if it's trying to die David Rientjes
2011-03-09 23:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-17 23:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-17 23:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-03-18 4:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-18 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-18 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-18 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-18 20:32 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08 3:06 ` [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110317165319.07be118e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).