linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:02:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110419070247.GE23985@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110419030532.392203618@intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00:05AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Dynamically compute the dirty expire timestamp at queue_io() time.
> 
> writeback_control.older_than_this used to be determined at entrance to
> the kupdate writeback work. This _static_ timestamp may go stale if the
> kupdate work runs on and on. The flusher may then stuck with some old
> busy inodes, never considering newly expired inodes thereafter.
> 
> This has two possible problems:
> 
> - It is unfair for a large dirty inode to delay (for a long time) the
>   writeback of small dirty inodes.
> 
> - As time goes by, the large and busy dirty inode may contain only
>   _freshly_ dirtied pages. Ignoring newly expired dirty inodes risks
>   delaying the expired dirty pages to the end of LRU lists, triggering
>   the evil pageout(). Nevertheless this patch merely addresses part
>   of the problem.

When wb_writeback() is called with for_kupdate set, it initialises
wbc->older_than_this appropriately outside the writeback loop.
queue_io() is called once per writeback_inodes_wb() call, which is
once per loop in wb_writeback. All your change does is re-initialise
older_than_this once per loop in wb_writeback, jus tin a different
and very non-obvious place.

So why didn't you just re-initialise it inside the loop in
wb_writeback() and leave all the other code alone?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-19 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-19  3:00 [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: pass writeback_control down to move_expired_inodes() Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  7:02   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-04-19  7:20     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  9:31       ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  7:35   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19  9:57     ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 12:56       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 13:46         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20  1:21         ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-20  2:53           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  0:45             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  2:06               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  3:01                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  3:59                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  4:10                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  4:36                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21  6:36                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 16:04                       ` Jan Kara
2011-04-22  2:24                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 21:12                           ` Jan Kara
2011-04-26  5:37                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 14:30                               ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20  7:38           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  1:01             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  1:47               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  9:47   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 10:20   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 11:16     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 21:10       ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20  7:50         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 15:22           ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21  3:33             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  4:39               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21  6:05                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 16:41                   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-22  2:32                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 21:23                       ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21  7:09               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  7:14                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21  7:52                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  8:00                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-19  3:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFS: return -EAGAIN when skipped commit in nfs_commit_unstable_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19  3:29   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-04-19  3:55     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  4:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-19  6:38 ` [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works Dave Chinner
2011-04-19  8:02   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21  5:50   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21  6:07       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21  7:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 10:15           ` Wu Fengguang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-22  5:09 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] writeback: try to write older pages first Wu Fengguang
2010-07-22  5:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2010-07-23 18:17   ` Jan Kara
2010-07-26 10:52   ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-26 11:32     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-01 15:29   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110419070247.GE23985@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).