From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7528D003B for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:40:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:40:08 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] NFS: return -EAGAIN when skipped commit in nfs_commit_unstable_pages() Message-ID: <20110421044008.GD22423@infradead.org> References: <20110419030003.108796967@intel.com> <20110419030532.902141228@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110419030532.902141228@intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Mel Gorman , Trond Myklebust , Dave Chinner , Itaru Kitayama , Minchan Kim , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > It's probably not sane to return success while redirtying the inode at > the same time in ->write_inode(). It is not, as it really confuses the writeback code. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org